"W. Martin Borgert" <deb...@debian.org> writes:
> A common file extension for DocBook files is '.dbk', which is not
> commonly used for any other purpose, at least on Linux.
Though I'm not familiar with the extension myself, I noticed that the
Wikipedia DocBook entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook) also
mentions it. Would it be appropriate to add support, presumably via
auto-mode-alist and schemas.xml?
The original report,
http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498125, contains a
patch against the Debian nxml-mode package. It would need some
adjustment to work with Emacs itself.
Thanks
--
Rob Browning
rlb @defaultvalue.org and @debian.org
GPG as of 2002-11-03 14DD 432F AE39 534D B592 F9A0 25C8 D377 8C7E 73A4
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-bugs-...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listm...@lists.debian.org
Trivial: '.dbk' is added to the auto-mode-alist (six chars)
and the uri pattern '*.dbk' is added for typeId DocBook to
schemas.xml (one line). Thanks for the reminder!
>> A common file extension for DocBook files is '.dbk', which is not
>> commonly used for any other purpose, at least on Linux.
>
> Though I'm not familiar with the extension myself, I noticed that the
> Wikipedia DocBook entry (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DocBook) also
> mentions it. Would it be appropriate to add support, presumably via
> auto-mode-alist and schemas.xml?
>
> The original report,
> http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=498125, contains a
> patch against the Debian nxml-mode package. It would need some
> adjustment to work with Emacs itself.
Fixed, thanks.