Hi again,
Commented inline.
You'll find more details concerning this issue.
> Hello Marcel!
>
> Quick reply below...
>
> On Thu, Nov 12, 2015 at 09:01:49PM -0500, Marcel wrote:
> > Hi Andreas.
> >
> > Thanks for your quick reply. I appreciate it.
> >
> > I reckon that the misuse of init scripts is my responsibility
> > however the service integration isn't perfect yet. A lot of
> > scripts/packages still use init scripts. Monit comes immediately
> > to my mind. It relies heavily on start/stop/restart.
>
> Any packaged software in Debian which directly invokes an init script
> (ignoring service policy etc.) instead of doing so via invoke-rc.d
> (which is the programmatical variant of the administrative 'service'
> interface) is in conflict with the Debian policy and thus RC-buggy.
> This is because 'policy-rc.d' should be taken into consideration which
> it isn't if the script is invoked directly.
I realize that, but I don't care. I expect packages to work, When
they don't, I reconfigure. Only debian maintainers should care about this.
That is my opinion.
>
>
https://www.debian.org/doc/debian-policy/ch-opersys.html#s9.3.3
>
> >
> > And I was in a state of panic. I know full well how catastrophic
> > the results of setting the clock too far away in time could do on this
> > system. I couldn't remember the command name 'service' so I relied
> > on what has been working faithfully for years, initd.
>
> Yes, fortunately the Debian systemd maintainers have LSB hooks in place
> to defer your direct invokation to became a systemctl command instead.
> (FWIW, the service command would also translate into a systemctl command
> when running under systemd.)
>
> >
> > I'll complete the transition to service whenever I have spare time.
> >
> > That being said, I saved the console so you can see each and every
> > command I typed yesterday and the system reaction or absence of:
>
> Awesome! Thanks.
> Even more awesome would be if you can reproduce the problem while
> hacking the init script to add 'set -x' at the top so we can see
> each and every command being run.
Yes of course. See the attached file 'stop.txt'. Strange enough,
'hwclock.sh stop' is reported doing its job with 'set -x' whereas
I know for a fact that it did not without.
> Might also be useful to know your configuration for local/UTC time
> in rtc, eg. /etc/adjtime
shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ cat /etc/adjtime
-0.135568 1447433065 0.000000
1447433065
LOCAL
> Also knowing your /etc/default/hwclock settings would be helpful.
BADYEAR=no
HWCLOCKACCESS=yes
HWCLOCKPARS=
HCTOSYS_DEVICE=rtc0
>
> Quick commends below (I'll try to find time to look at this
> with more details in the future).
No emergency. Daylights savings are ON for all winter.
It would be great if it were fixed for spring though.
>
> >
> > shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh
> > [ ok ] Usage: hwclock.sh {start|stop|reload|force-reload|show}.
> > [ ok ] start sets kernel (system) clock from hardware (RTC) clock.
> > [ ok ] stop and reload set hardware (RTC) clock from kernel (system) clock.
>
> ok.
>
> > shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh stop
> > shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ date
> > mercredi 11 novembre 2015, 23:26:56 (UTC-0500)
> > shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh show
> > jeu 12 nov 2015 00:28:19 EST -0.084876 secondes
> > shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ date
> > mercredi 11 novembre 2015, 23:27:30 (UTC-0500)
>
> So your system time seems it was 1 day behind your RTC time.
No, it was 1 hour. There's 1h between 11120028 and 11112328,
not 25.
> Some serious time drift right there (unless your system time was
> updated without syncing the RTC earlier somehow).
>
It's not drift. It's daylight savings turned on.
And yes, 'system time was updated without syncing the RTC earlier
somehow': The system time was updated sunday to compensate for
daylight savings. It's automatic. But on shutdown 2 days ago, the
RTC wasn't automatically updated from system time as it should have.
Upon restart, the system time was updated from the wrong RTC time.
So the system restarted with 1 hr ahead of time, and worse, with 1 day
ahead of time too.
See excerpt of syslog:
(...)
Nov 11 23:03:26 gt5232h-a3e401d kmotion_hkd1[20621]: signal SIGHUP detected, re-reading config file
Nov 11 23:03:26 gt5232h-a3e401d freshclam[987]: Update process terminated
Nov 12 00:14:13 gt5232h-a3e401d rsyslogd: [origin software="rsyslogd" swVersion="8.4.2" x-pid="1262" x-info="
http://www.rsyslog.com"] start
Nov 12 00:14:13 gt5232h-a3e401d rsyslogd-2307: warning: ~ action is deprecated, consider using the 'stop' statement instead [try
http://www.rsyslog.co
m/e/2307 ]
(...)
I rebooted at 23:03
The log ends at 11:03 PM on 11/11 and restarts at 12:14 AM on 11/12
You see a 1 hr 11 minutes difference whereas it was really 11 minutes.
It took 11 minutes because a filecheck was triggered.
However I made a supplemental mistake.
I didn't realized we crossed midnight when I set the system
time with the date command. I set the time correctly 1 hr back
but I forgot to also remove 1 day to the currently reported day,
worsening an already fragile situation.
E.g. (retrieved from history)
5481 sudo date 11122320 (oops, we're still 11/11!)
5482 sudo date 11112320
> > shizuma@gt5232h-a3e401d:~$ sudo /etc/init.d/hwclock.sh reload
> > [info] Saving the system clock.
> > [info] Hardware Clock updated to mercredi 11 novembre 2015, 23:28:07 (UTC-0500).
>
> Here you just wrote your system time to the RTC, which I guess means
> you messed up your RTC time.
That is precisely what I wanted. To copy the system time, which was now correct
to the RTC which was still not.
I already do. It's of paramount importance to me that the system time
is exact. I do run ntpd for years.
I repeat, the real issue is that on reboot, the system time wasn't
automatically saved to the RTC as it should have. So the system
restarted with the time reported being 1 hour later than expected
and the day after on top of that.
The 'stop' issue is secondary and trivial as I would always realize that
something is wrong whenever I run it.
Thanks again and best regards.