Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss

Bug#1016424: “Error: /invalidfileaccess in --file--” when converting PBM file to PDF

46 views
Skip to first unread message

anonymous coward

unread,
Jul 31, 2022, 10:20:03 AM7/31/22
to
Package: ghostscript
Version: 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u2
Severity: normal
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.gh...@sideload.33mail.com

Ghostscript fails to convert PBM files to PDF. Attempts were made with
3 different PBM files:

1) scanner-made PDF → (pdfimages -all) → (unpaper) → PBM → (ghostscript/pdfwrite) → error
2) tex → (LaTeX) → PDF → (ghostscript/pbm) → PBM → (ghostscript/pdfwrite) → error
3) (imagemagick) → PBM → (ghostscript/pdfwrite) → error

This seems to show that PBMs of any kind produce an error when using
the PDFwrite driver. Case 2 is interesting because it shows
Ghostscript’s own output is fed back into it and it can’t handle it.
Case 3 is demonstrated below because it requires no source file to
start with (ImageMagick gives a way to generate an arbitrary image
on-the-fly). So it’s easy to reproduce as long as ImageMagick is
installed.

===8<------------------------------
$ convert logo: -colors 2 -colorspace gray -normalize pbm:im_logo.pbm

$ gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -q -r300 -dSCALE=1 -o im_logo.pdf -- /usr/share/ghostscript/9.53.3/lib/viewpbm.ps im_logo.pbm
Error: /invalidfileaccess in --file--
Operand stack:
(im_logo.pbm) (r)
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1990 1 3 %oparray_pop 1989 1 3 %oparray_pop 1977 1 3 %oparray_pop 1833 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %array_continue --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:734/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:87/200(L)-- --dict:0/20(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
Last OS error: Permission denied
Current file position is 10282
GPL Ghostscript 9.53.3: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
===8<------------------------------

It’s worth noting that case 2 has no problem if the middle step uses
the ppmraw driver instead of the pbm driver. So I thought perhaps a
workaround would be to convert the PBM file produced by unpaper (case
1) to PPM, then feed the PPM file into GS -- but no, the same
“invalidfileaccess” occurs. I also retried case 3 but using a PPM
instead, which also failed:

===8<------------------------------
$ convert logo: -colors 2 -colorspace gray -normalize pbm:im_logo.ppm
$ gs -sDEVICE=pdfwrite -q -r300 -dSCALE=1 -o im_logo_ppm.pdf -- /usr/share/ghostscript/9.53.3/lib/viewpbm.ps im_logo.ppm
Error: /invalidfileaccess in --file--
Operand stack:
(im_logo.ppm) (r)
Execution stack:
%interp_exit .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- false 1 %stopped_push 1990 1 3 %oparray_pop 1989 1 3 %oparray_pop 1977 1 3 %oparray_pop 1833 1 3 %oparray_pop --nostringval-- %errorexec_pop .runexec2 --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- 2 %stopped_push --nostringval-- --nostringval-- --nostringval-- %array_continue --nostringval--
Dictionary stack:
--dict:734/1123(ro)(G)-- --dict:0/20(G)-- --dict:87/200(L)-- --dict:0/20(L)--
Current allocation mode is local
Last OS error: Permission denied
Current file position is 10282
GPL Ghostscript 9.53.3: Unrecoverable error, exit code 1
===8<------------------------------

-- System Information:
Debian Release: 11.4
APT prefers stable-updates
APT policy: (990, 'stable-updates'), (990, 'stable-security'), (990, 'testing'), (990, 'stable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 5.10.0-16-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU threads)
Kernel taint flags: TAINT_OOT_MODULE, TAINT_UNSIGNED_MODULE
Locale: LANG=en_US.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8), LANGUAGE not set
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
LSM: AppArmor: enabled

Versions of packages ghostscript depends on:
ii libc6 2.31-13+deb11u3
ii libgs9 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u2

ghostscript recommends no packages.

Versions of packages ghostscript suggests:
ii ghostscript-x 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u2

-- no debconf information

Jonas Smedegaard

unread,
Jul 31, 2022, 12:40:04 PM7/31/22
to
Quoting anonymous coward (2022-07-31 16:11:44)
> Package: ghostscript
> Version: 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u2
> Severity: normal
> X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug.gh...@sideload.33mail.com
>
> Ghostscript fails to convert PBM files to PDF. Attempts were made with
> 3 different PBM files:
>
> 1) scanner-made PDF → (pdfimages -all) → (unpaper) → PBM → (ghostscript/pdfwrite) → error
> 2) tex → (LaTeX) → PDF → (ghostscript/pbm) → PBM → (ghostscript/pdfwrite) → error
> 3) (imagemagick) → PBM → (ghostscript/pdfwrite) → error
>
> This seems to show that PBMs of any kind produce an error when using
> the PDFwrite driver.

Thanks for reporting this issue.

None of the patched carried for the Debian build of Ghostscript is
likely causing any deviation related to this, so it is most likely a bug
upstream (assuming upstream considers this a supported us of
Ghostscript).

Therefore please report the issue upstream.

Kind regards,


- Jonas

--
* Jonas Smedegaard - idealist & Internet-arkitekt
* Tlf.: +45 40843136 Website: http://dr.jones.dk/

[x] quote me freely [ ] ask before reusing [ ] keep private
signature.asc

anonymous coward

unread,
Jul 31, 2022, 4:00:03 PM7/31/22
to
Package: ghostscript
Version: 9.53.3~dfsg-7+deb11u2
Followup-For: Bug #1016424
X-Debbugs-Cc: debbug....@sideload.33mail.com

> Therefore please report the issue upstream.

I just happened to have an account on the upstream bug tracker that
still works, so I reported here:

https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705699

But I should say this it’s not normal procedure for Debian maintainers
to ask bug reporters to mirror their report upstream according to the
section “Don't file bugs upstream” on this page:

https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting

If upstream had been a place like Github (or even worse: gitlab.com),
I would not have created an account on those forges to report a bug.
In principle, it should be automated so a Debian maintainer can mirror
bugs upstream with a simple keystroke or click, ideally.

Jonas Smedegaard

unread,
Jul 31, 2022, 4:20:03 PM7/31/22
to
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705699

Quoting anonymous coward (2022-07-31 21:46:27)
> > Therefore please report the issue upstream.
>
> I just happened to have an account on the upstream bug tracker that
> still works, so I reported here:
>
> https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=705699

Thanks!

[ notes on how I should do my work in Debian snipped ]
signature.asc
0 new messages