Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#1024524: Thunderbird: mail.compose.other.header side effects
64 views
Skip to first unread message
Pascal Hambourg
Nov 20, 2022, 6:20:03 PM11/20/22
to
Package: thunderbird
Version: 1:102.5.0-1~deb11u1
Hello,
A long time ago, I set
mail.compose.other.header=References,In-Reply-To,Message-ID,Sender
in order to be able to set or override some header values when composing
a mail or newsgroup post. It has worked as expected so far.
This version introduced an unexpected behaviour.
1) When composing a reply, if mail.compose.other.header contains
"References" then default In-Reply-To: and References: headers are missing.
2) When viewing a mail or newsgroup post, with Display > Headers >
Normal is selected (mail.show_headers=1), any header present in
mail.compose.other.header and in the message is displayed with an empty
value.
Steps to reproduce:
Set mail.compose.other.header=References
Stop and restart Thunderbird.
Display any existing reply message which has a Reference: header.
Compose a reply to a mail or newsgroup article and save it as draft.
Display the message source (Ctrl+u) and check that the Reference: and/or
In-Reply-To headers are missing.
Version: 1:102.5.0-1~deb11u1
Hello,
A long time ago, I set
mail.compose.other.header=References,In-Reply-To,Message-ID,Sender
in order to be able to set or override some header values when composing
a mail or newsgroup post. It has worked as expected so far.
This version introduced an unexpected behaviour.
1) When composing a reply, if mail.compose.other.header contains
"References" then default In-Reply-To: and References: headers are missing.
2) When viewing a mail or newsgroup post, with Display > Headers >
Normal is selected (mail.show_headers=1), any header present in
mail.compose.other.header and in the message is displayed with an empty
value.
Steps to reproduce:
Set mail.compose.other.header=References
Stop and restart Thunderbird.
Display any existing reply message which has a Reference: header.
Compose a reply to a mail or newsgroup article and save it as draft.
Display the message source (Ctrl+u) and check that the Reference: and/or
In-Reply-To headers are missing.
Carsten Schoenert
Nov 21, 2022, 3:10:04 AM11/21/22
to
Control: tags -1 upstream
Hello Pascal,
this sounds not as an regression that is based on Debian packaging and
modification. This sounds more like some upstream issue maybe introduced
recently by the upstream development.
Could you please report your problem to the Bugzilla bugtracker and give
us a linking to the bug report afterwards?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
In the past upstream could fix such similar reports quite quick, so the
chances to get a MZLNA developer interested is high to me.
Am 21.11.22 um 00:10 schrieb Pascal Hambourg:
--
Regards
Carsten
Hello Pascal,
this sounds not as an regression that is based on Debian packaging and
modification. This sounds more like some upstream issue maybe introduced
recently by the upstream development.
Could you please report your problem to the Bugzilla bugtracker and give
us a linking to the bug report afterwards?
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org
In the past upstream could fix such similar reports quite quick, so the
chances to get a MZLNA developer interested is high to me.
Am 21.11.22 um 00:10 schrieb Pascal Hambourg:
Regards
Carsten
Carsten Schoenert
Nov 21, 2022, 3:40:03 PM11/21/22
to
Control: forwarded -1 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1800759
Hello Pascal,
I've added that upstream bug report so the BTS will inform if something
is happen within the upstream report.
Thanks!
Am 21.11.22 um 21:31 schrieb Pascal Hambourg:
> Hello Carsten,
> Bugzilla found an existing bug report which seems to be related:
> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1800759>
> I added my observations and will report.
--
Regards
Carsten
Hello Pascal,
I've added that upstream bug report so the BTS will inform if something
is happen within the upstream report.
Thanks!
Am 21.11.22 um 21:31 schrieb Pascal Hambourg:
> Hello Carsten,
>
> On 21/11/2022 at 08:53, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>>
>> Could you please report your problem to the Bugzilla bugtracker and give
>> us a linking to the bug report afterwards?
>
> Thank you for the quick reply.
> On 21/11/2022 at 08:53, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>>
>> Could you please report your problem to the Bugzilla bugtracker and give
>> us a linking to the bug report afterwards?
>
> Bugzilla found an existing bug report which seems to be related:
> <https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1800759>
> I added my observations and will report.
--
Regards
Carsten
Pascal Hambourg
Nov 21, 2022, 3:50:03 PM11/21/22
to
Hello Carsten,
On 21/11/2022 at 08:53, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>
On 21/11/2022 at 08:53, Carsten Schoenert wrote:
>
> Could you please report your problem to the Bugzilla bugtracker and give
> us a linking to the bug report afterwards?
> us a linking to the bug report afterwards?
0 new messages