Google Groups no longer supports new Usenet posts or subscriptions. Historical content remains viewable.
Dismiss
Bug#1033570: unblock: kdenlive/22.12.3-2
1 view
Skip to first unread message
Paul Gevers
Apr 12, 2023, 3:20:05 PM4/12/23
to
Control: tags -1 moreinfo
Hi Patrick
On 27-03-2023 17:06, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> as mentioned in my unblock #1033554 for mlt I were a bit too stupid to read the
> freeze policy correctly. I would like to see kdenlive 22.12.3-2 in bookworm,
> it just fixes some upstream bugs and two Debian bugs (missing dependencies).
Can you please elaborate? It appears that this is a bug fix only
release, can you confirm? What's the upstream policy for such releases?
I didn't spot any upstream changelog, can you describe what the changes
are supposed to achieve?
> The debdiff is - except of the translation files - small.
Might have been nice to filter them out :).
> Fixing annoying upstream bugs and missing dependencies in the packaging.
Any pointers to which bugs those are?
> Software with known fixed bugs :)
Ack.
> [ Risks ]
> If mlt is not allowed to enter bookworm the "risk" would be that I would like
> to request a upload of this kdenlive version directly to testing?
You may have guessed from the silence (see also our FAQ [1]) that we're
not enthusiastic about mlt. I'm currently leaning towards the tpu route
for kdenlive.
Paul
[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/FAQ.html
Hi Patrick
On 27-03-2023 17:06, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
> as mentioned in my unblock #1033554 for mlt I were a bit too stupid to read the
> freeze policy correctly. I would like to see kdenlive 22.12.3-2 in bookworm,
> it just fixes some upstream bugs and two Debian bugs (missing dependencies).
Can you please elaborate? It appears that this is a bug fix only
release, can you confirm? What's the upstream policy for such releases?
I didn't spot any upstream changelog, can you describe what the changes
are supposed to achieve?
> The debdiff is - except of the translation files - small.
Might have been nice to filter them out :).
> Fixing annoying upstream bugs and missing dependencies in the packaging.
Any pointers to which bugs those are?
> Software with known fixed bugs :)
Ack.
> [ Risks ]
> If mlt is not allowed to enter bookworm the "risk" would be that I would like
> to request a upload of this kdenlive version directly to testing?
You may have guessed from the silence (see also our FAQ [1]) that we're
not enthusiastic about mlt. I'm currently leaning towards the tpu route
for kdenlive.
Paul
[1] https://release.debian.org/testing/FAQ.html
Paul Gevers
Apr 15, 2023, 4:00:04 PM4/15/23
to
Control: tags -1 confirmed
Hi Patrick,
Thanks.
On 14-04-2023 10:45, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> You may have guessed from the silence (see also our FAQ [1]) that
>> we're not enthusiastic about mlt. I'm currently leaning towards the
>> tpu route for kdenlive.
Please upload the version you have in unstable to
testing-proposed-uploads with only an added changelog entry. I prefer a
+deb12u1 version bump (because that will automatically be synced to
unstable), but I can live with ~deb12u1 too if you prefer that.
Paul
Hi Patrick,
Thanks.
On 14-04-2023 10:45, Patrick Matthäi wrote:
>> You may have guessed from the silence (see also our FAQ [1]) that
>> we're not enthusiastic about mlt. I'm currently leaning towards the
>> tpu route for kdenlive.
testing-proposed-uploads with only an added changelog entry. I prefer a
+deb12u1 version bump (because that will automatically be synced to
unstable), but I can live with ~deb12u1 too if you prefer that.
Paul
Patrick Matthäi
Apr 17, 2023, 6:40:04 AM4/17/23
to
PS: It works better with testing-proposed-updates instead of
testing-proposed-uploads :D
0 new messages