Re: riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test

0 views
Skip to first unread message

linux.r...@gmail.com

unread,
May 11, 2025, 6:22:42 PMMay 11
to linux-ris...@googlegroups.com, nam...@linutronix.de
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the Linux RISC-V mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=961793

---Test result---
Test Summary:
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv32-defconfig PASS 112.63 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig ERROR 677.94 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig PASS 1349.72 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig PASS 21.64 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt PASS 23.15 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" checkpatch WARNING 2.84 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" dtb-warn-rv64 PASS 68.34 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" header-inline PASS 0.25 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" kdoc PASS 0.88 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" module-param PASS 0.26 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" verify-fixes PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" verify-signedoff PASS 0.31 seconds

Details
##############################
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test"
Test: build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig - ERROR
Desc: Builds riscv64 allmodconfig with Clang, and checks for errors and added warnings
Output:
Redirect to /build/tmp.SRBGJRolqo and /build/tmp.DjtdEYQx1J
Tree base:
579d751f33a06 ("Adding CI files")
Building the whole tree with the patch
error:
/build/tmp7vwiltg5/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S:55:12: error: operand must be a symbol with a %pcrel_hi/%got_pcrel_hi/%tls_ie_pcrel_hi/%tls_gd_pcrel_hi modifier or an integer in the range [0, 1048575]
/build/tmp7vwiltg5/arch/riscv/kernel/tests/kprobes/test-kprobes-asm.S:59:12: error: operand must be a symbol with a %pcrel_hi/%got_pcrel_hi/%tls_ie_pcrel_hi/%tls_gd_pcrel_hi modifier or an integer in the range [0, 1048575]



real 11m11.960s
user 431m47.142s
sys 80m56.394s
##############################
Patch 1: "riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test"
Test: checkpatch - WARNING
Desc: Runs checkpatch.pl on the patch
Output:
WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol with at least 4 lines
#39: FILE: arch/riscv/kernel/tests/Kconfig.debug:33:
+config RISCV_KPROBES_KUNIT
+ bool "KUnit test for riscv kprobes" if !KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ depends on KUNIT
+ depends on KPROBES
+ default KUNIT_ALL_TESTS
+ help
+ Enable testing for riscv kprobes. Useful for riscv and/or kprobes
+ development.
+
+ If unsure, say N.
+

WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#61:
new file mode 100644

total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 335 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit d3f92dc70b7e ("riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 2 warnings, 0 checks, 335 lines checked
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
WARNING: please write a help paragraph that fully describes the config symbol with at least 4 lines




---
Regards,
Linux RISC-V bot

linux.r...@gmail.com

unread,
May 13, 2025, 12:37:35 PMMay 13
to linux-ris...@googlegroups.com, nam...@linutronix.de
This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the Linux RISC-V mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=962476

---Test result---
Test Summary:
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv32-defconfig PASS 105.69 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig PASS 974.86 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig PASS 1258.88 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig PASS 20.48 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt PASS 21.35 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" checkpatch WARNING 2.86 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" dtb-warn-rv64 PASS 68.19 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" header-inline PASS 0.24 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" kdoc PASS 0.89 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" module-param PASS 0.26 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" verify-fixes PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test" verify-signedoff PASS 0.30 seconds

Details
##############################
Patch 1: "[v2] riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test"
Test: checkpatch - WARNING
Desc: Runs checkpatch.pl on the patch
Output:
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#61:
new file mode 100644

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 330 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit d2e5debccc15 ("riscv: Add kprobes KUnit test") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 330 lines checked
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?




Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages