Re: efi: Add a mechanism for embedding SBAT section

[linux.r...@gmail.com]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the Linux RISC-V mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:
PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=959672

---Test result---
Test Summary:
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv32-defconfig PASS 107.33 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig PASS 932.87 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig PASS 1211.39 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig PASS 20.86 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt PASS 21.86 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" checkpatch PASS 1.24 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" dtb-warn-rv64 PASS 66.86 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" header-inline PASS 0.22 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" kdoc PASS 0.91 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" module-param PASS 0.36 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" verify-fixes PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 1: "[v2,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" verify-signedoff PASS 0.29 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv32-defconfig PASS 107.21 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig PASS 908.85 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig PASS 1177.93 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig PASS 21.06 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt PASS 21.43 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" checkpatch WARNING 2.54 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" dtb-warn-rv64 PASS 67.58 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" header-inline PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" kdoc PASS 0.92 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" module-param PASS 0.28 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" verify-fixes PASS 0.22 seconds
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" verify-signedoff PASS 0.29 seconds

Details
##############################
Patch 2: "[v2,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86"
Test: checkpatch - WARNING
Desc: Runs checkpatch.pl on the patch
Output:
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?
#62:
new file mode 100644

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 93 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit 713e3fae961a ("x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.
total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 93 lines checked
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?




---
Regards,
Linux RISC-V bot

[linux.r...@gmail.com]

This is automated email and please do not reply to this email!

Dear submitter,

Thank you for submitting the patches to the Linux RISC-V mailing list.
This is a CI test results with your patch series:

PW Link:https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-riscv/list/?series=962433

---Test result---
Test Summary:
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv32-defconfig PASS 103.90 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig PASS 908.88 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig PASS 1173.13 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig PASS 20.07 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt PASS 21.14 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" checkpatch PASS 1.26 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" dtb-warn-rv64 PASS 66.41 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" header-inline PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" kdoc PASS 0.84 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" module-param PASS 0.26 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" verify-fixes PASS 0.22 seconds
Patch 1: "[v3,1/2] efi: zboot specific mechanism for embedding SBAT section" verify-signedoff PASS 0.30 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv32-defconfig PASS 103.88 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-clang-allmodconfig PASS 887.61 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-gcc-allmodconfig PASS 1140.59 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-nommu-k210-defconfig PASS 20.56 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" build-rv64-nommu-k210-virt PASS 20.99 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" checkpatch WARNING 2.52 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" dtb-warn-rv64 PASS 66.99 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" header-inline PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" kdoc PASS 0.89 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" module-param PASS 0.25 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" verify-fixes PASS 0.23 seconds
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86" verify-signedoff PASS 0.30 seconds

Details
##############################
Patch 2: "[v3,2/2] x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86"

Test: checkpatch - WARNING
Desc: Runs checkpatch.pl on the patch
Output:
WARNING: added, moved or deleted file(s), does MAINTAINERS need updating?

#54:
new file mode 100644

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 91 lines checked

NOTE: For some of the reported defects, checkpatch may be able to
mechanically convert to the typical style using --fix or --fix-inplace.

Commit 6d7911e3c83c ("x86/efi: Implement support for embedding SBAT data for x86") has style problems, please review.

NOTE: Ignored message types: ALLOC_SIZEOF_STRUCT CAMELCASE COMMIT_LOG_LONG_LINE GIT_COMMIT_ID MACRO_ARG_REUSE NO_AUTHOR_SIGN_OFF

NOTE: If any of the errors are false positives, please report
them to the maintainer, see CHECKPATCH in MAINTAINERS.

total: 0 errors, 1 warnings, 0 checks, 91 lines checked