Groups

linux-apfs

Contact owners and managers

1–30 of 97

0 selected

greeland pushome

6/11/25

Buy/Sell/Trade Vookum Luxury Watches/Jewelries

Telegram..@bennydajeweler . Vookum LJ deals with buying, selling and trading of Luxurious Watches and

unread,

Buy/Sell/Trade Vookum Luxury Watches/Jewelries

Telegram..@bennydajeweler . Vookum LJ deals with buying, selling and trading of Luxurious Watches and

6/11/25

5/29/24

Linux systems engineer - freeland

Hi, I saw a message from several years ago - was wondering if you're still available on a

unread,

Linux systems engineer - freeland

Hi, I saw a message from several years ago - was wondering if you're still available on a

5/29/24

greeland pushome

5/22/24

Buy K2 Sheets and K2 Spray (Diablo)

WhatsApp/ Text:: +1(724) 491-7162 Buy K2 Sheets and K2 Spray (Diablo) WhatsApp/ Text:: +1(724) 491-

unread,

Buy K2 Sheets and K2 Spray (Diablo)

WhatsApp/ Text:: +1(724) 491-7162 Buy K2 Sheets and K2 Spray (Diablo) WhatsApp/ Text:: +1(724) 491-

5/22/24

Gilgamesh, Ernesto A. Fernández2

9/6/23

[linux-apfs-rw] Development Plan Consult

Hi, On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 08:51:09AM +0800, Gilgamesh wrote: > I plan to develop on the basis of

unread,

[linux-apfs-rw] Development Plan Consult

Hi, On Wed, Sep 06, 2023 at 08:51:09AM +0800, Gilgamesh wrote: > I plan to develop on the basis of

9/6/23

Milan P. Stanić, Ernesto A. Fernández6

10/6/22

build fails with newer kernels

Hi, On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:03:11PM +0200, Milan P. Stanić wrote: > On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 14:58

unread,

build fails with newer kernels

Hi, On Thu, Oct 06, 2022 at 01:03:11PM +0200, Milan P. Stanić wrote: > On Wed, 2022-10-05 at 14:58

10/6/22

Alien, Ernesto A. Fernández3

10/9/21

Can apfsprogs add some importants?

I want to build a distro, but the real root fs is apfs. Some device manager can't identify the

unread,

Can apfsprogs add some importants?

I want to build a distro, but the real root fs is apfs. Some device manager can't identify the

10/9/21

Su Yue, Ernesto A. Fernández7

6/23/21

[PATCH 1/2] fix failed compilation due to lookup_in v5.11

On Thu 24 Jun 2021 at 01:25, Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mn...@gmail.com> wrote: >

unread,

[PATCH 1/2] fix failed compilation due to lookup_in v5.11

On Thu 24 Jun 2021 at 01:25, Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mn...@gmail.com> wrote: >

6/23/21

6/23/21

[PATCH resend] fix failed compilation due to lookup_bdev in v5.11

Linux commit 4e7b5671c6a8 ("block: remove i_bdev") changed function lookup_bdev(): -struct

unread,

[PATCH resend] fix failed compilation due to lookup_bdev in v5.11

Linux commit 4e7b5671c6a8 ("block: remove i_bdev") changed function lookup_bdev(): -struct

6/23/21

1/3/21

unread,

1/3/21

Ernesto A. Fernández

5/30/20

Re: [linux-apfs/apfsprogs] Copy Files (#3)

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:51:20PM -0700, Shreyas Lad wrote: > How can I copy files to an APFS

unread,

Re: [linux-apfs/apfsprogs] Copy Files (#3)

On Fri, May 29, 2020 at 03:51:20PM -0700, Shreyas Lad wrote: > How can I copy files to an APFS

5/30/20

Ernesto A. Fernández2

3/14/20

Re: [linux-apfs/linux-apfs-oot] bad node only when mounting volume 0 (#3)

> running `apfsck -w ...` gives the same output. `apfsck -c` doesn't give any output. Perhaps

unread,

Re: [linux-apfs/linux-apfs-oot] bad node only when mounting volume 0 (#3)

> running `apfsck -w ...` gives the same output. `apfsck -c` doesn't give any output. Perhaps

3/14/20

Ernesto A. Fernández

2/2/20

Re: [linux-apfs/apfsprogs] mkapfs on specific partition (#2)

Hi, On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 01:32:46PM -0800, tucari wrote: > Is it possible with the current

unread,

Re: [linux-apfs/apfsprogs] mkapfs on specific partition (#2)

Hi, On Fri, Jan 31, 2020 at 01:32:46PM -0800, tucari wrote: > Is it possible with the current

2/2/20

Chih-Hsuan Yen, Ernesto A. Fernández4

8/25/19

[PATCH 0/1] Allow using this tree with dkms

Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mn...@gmail.com> 於 2019年8月26日週一上午6:39寫道： > > Hi,

unread,

[PATCH 0/1] Allow using this tree with dkms

Ernesto A. Fernández <ernesto.mn...@gmail.com> 於 2019年8月26日週一上午6:39寫道： > > Hi,

8/25/19

Ernesto A. Fernández13

3/25/19

[PATCH 01/13] apfsck: verify NULL-termination of volume name

Check that the features reported by a volume superblock are all valid and supported. Signed-off-by:

unread,

[PATCH 01/13] apfsck: verify NULL-termination of volume name

Check that the features reported by a volume superblock are all valid and supported. Signed-off-by:

3/25/19

Ernesto A. Fernández9

3/25/19

[PATCH 1/9] apfsck: refactor hash table code

The root and private directories must be named "root" and "private-dir",

unread,

[PATCH 1/9] apfsck: refactor hash table code

The root and private directories must be named "root" and "private-dir",

3/25/19

Ernesto A. Fernández5

3/14/19

[PATCH 1/5] apfsck: rework sibling name allocation

The fsck tool already supports inodes, dstreams, dentries, xattrs and siblings. These should be

unread,

[PATCH 1/5] apfsck: rework sibling name allocation

The fsck tool already supports inodes, dstreams, dentries, xattrs and siblings. These should be

3/14/19

Ernesto A. Fernández2

3/14/19

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: fix year of copyright

When parse_subtree() is done with a node, it should release it with free_node() instead of just free(

unread,

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: fix year of copyright

When parse_subtree() is done with a node, it should release it with free_node() instead of just free(

3/14/19

Ernesto A. Fernández2

3/14/19

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: move inode size information to dstream

Some xattrs keep their contents in a data stream, like inodes do, so run the same checks on them.

unread,

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: move inode size information to dstream

Some xattrs keep their contents in a data stream, like inodes do, so run the same checks on them.

3/14/19

Ernesto A. Fernández5

3/14/19

[PATCH 1/5] apfsck: check length of xattr record values

Verify that inodes with the HAS_SECURITY_EA flag actually have a xattr for the access control lists,

unread,

[PATCH 1/5] apfsck: check length of xattr record values

Verify that inodes with the HAS_SECURITY_EA flag actually have a xattr for the access control lists,

3/14/19

Ernesto A. Fernández2

3/10/19

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: check consistency of inode flags

Some of the internal flags of an inode announce the presence of a given type of xfield. No xfield

unread,

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: check consistency of inode flags

Some of the internal flags of an inode announce the presence of a given type of xfield. No xfield

3/10/19

Ernesto A. Fernández5

3/7/19

[PATCH 1/5] apfsck: add cli options to pick the checks to run

There are several types of extended fields that I have never encountered so far. Some checks can be

unread,

[PATCH 1/5] apfsck: add cli options to pick the checks to run

There are several types of extended fields that I have never encountered so far. Some checks can be

3/7/19

Ernesto A. Fernández3

3/7/19

[PATCH 1/3] apfsck: check that xfields are not repeated

Verify that extended fields of known types have the expected set of flags. This information has been

unread,

[PATCH 1/3] apfsck: check that xfields are not repeated

Verify that extended fields of known types have the expected set of flags. This information has been

3/7/19

Ernesto A. Fernández

3/3/19

Out-of-tree repository

I started a new repository for the APFS module at git://github.com/eafer/linux-apfs-oot.git

unread,

Out-of-tree repository

I started a new repository for the APFS module at git://github.com/eafer/linux-apfs-oot.git

3/3/19

Ernesto A. Fernández3

3/2/19

[PATCH 1/3] apfsck: verify the name of an inode's primary link

It seems that sibling ids come from the same pool as inode numbers, so values under

unread,

[PATCH 1/3] apfsck: verify the name of an inode's primary link

It seems that sibling ids come from the same pool as inode numbers, so values under

3/2/19

Ernesto A. Fernández6

3/1/19

[PATCH 1/6] apfsck: check that rdev xfield is only on devices

A dentry will only use xfields to report its sibling link id, so there will never be more than one.

unread,

[PATCH 1/6] apfsck: check that rdev xfield is only on devices

A dentry will only use xfields to report its sibling link id, so there will never be more than one.

3/1/19

Ernesto A. Fernández7

2/26/19

[PATCH 1/7] apfsck: improve checks for inode ids

A sparse inode reports the total length of its holes in an extended field. Check that it's

unread,

[PATCH 1/7] apfsck: improve checks for inode ids

A sparse inode reports the total length of its holes in an extended field. Check that it's

2/26/19

Ernesto A. Fernández

2/25/19

[PATCH] apfsck: check that catalog keys are valid

Currently, read_cat_key() confuses keys of invalid types with header-only keys. Fix that. Signed-off-

unread,

[PATCH] apfsck: check that catalog keys are valid

Currently, read_cat_key() confuses keys of invalid types with header-only keys. Fix that. Signed-off-

2/25/19

Ernesto A. Fernández8

2/23/19

[PATCH 1/8] apfsck: keep a list of all inodes in a volume

Check that count and size of extended fields are consistent for each dentry record. The new code was

unread,

[PATCH 1/8] apfsck: keep a list of all inodes in a volume

Check that count and size of extended fields are consistent for each dentry record. The new code was

2/23/19

Ernesto A. Fernández3

2/17/19

[PATCH 1/3] apfs: use macros to work with the dentry hash

Work on the fsck tool seems to have settled an old doubt about the order of dentry keys with the same

unread,

[PATCH 1/3] apfs: use macros to work with the dentry hash

Work on the fsck tool seems to have settled an old doubt about the order of dentry keys with the same

2/17/19

Ernesto A. Fernández2

2/14/19

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: don't normalize key names for comparison

Despite sharing the same field, only the dentry hash is relevant for the ordering; the name length

unread,

[PATCH 1/2] apfsck: don't normalize key names for comparison

Despite sharing the same field, only the dentry hash is relevant for the ordering; the name length

2/14/19

Search

Clear search

Close search

Google apps

Main menu