> I have an older version of Linrad running, perhaps a year old.
> I would love to try the version with the squelch, but I have forgotten more
> than I learned about the install process so I am struggling through an older
> version
> for now. I think it was the version released just before portaudio was
> implemented.
I suggest you install the latest version in a new linrad directory.
That is the default if you use installers under Windows.
Mor recent versions are more user friendly (i hope) and I think
you will find that setup is finished in a couple of minutes at most.
Anything that you do will not affect your old installation.
Linrad does not write anything in the registry or elsewhere
outside the linrad directory with an exception for the EME
database which has a fixed place in the file system.
> I have the noise blanker partially working, but only on weak signal CW.
> I do not have a noise blanker at all in the SSB or AM mode.
> I would very much like the to run the noise blanker in those modes, but
> don't remember how to add it to those modes.
"Linrad for newcomers" is the reference page for basic info:
http://www.sm5bsz.com/linuxdsp/usage/newco/newcomer.htm#BLANKER
It says: "The second FFT must be enabled to allow the noise blanker"
73
Leif
> After considerable research I have concluded the following on the Linrad
> noise blanker.
> On 160 meters, with the smart noise blanker, I see 6db of noise reduction.
> With only
> the dumb or both together, I see 10 to 11db of blanking. After turning on
> the blanker
> I see a difference in the wide waterfall, but no difference in the wide
> spectrum.
Correct. See die block diagram:
http://www.sm5bsz.com/linuxdsp/usage/newco/newcomer.htm#BLANKER
wide graph is before the blanker, waterfall is after.
> I can readily adjust the blanking level of the dumb blanker. I find no
> adjustment
> at all for the smart blanker (except for the limiter which turns parts of
> the wide waterfall red).
The two control bars for routing signals through or at the side of
the blanker are common to both blankers.
The clever blanker requires correct calibration and that the pulses have
a much larger bandwidth than your system so they actually are determined
by the pulse response of your system.
> I have never seen the Blue number in the upper right hand corner read
> anything above 0.
Have a look here:
http://www.sm5bsz.com/linuxdsp/blanker/leonids.htm
Fig 8 for example. The clever blanker removes 2%. This is bad
powerline noise with groups of about 10 pulses repeating at 100 Hz.
That is 1000 pulses per second.
73
Leif / SM5BSZ
> The wide graph on figure 2 seems to show a substantial improvment for only
> having the noise blanker on while other later figures do not show the same
> improvement. Figure 2 is what confused me. It would seem that I do not have
> enough line noise to read anything higher than 0 for the smart blanker.
http://www.sm5bsz.com/linuxdsp/blanker/leonids.htm
To understand anything you have to read all the text. I suggest
you download the recording and practise on it.
Figure 2 is during a short period without any powerline noise
in the recording. It is intended as a reference for "perfect
blanker operation" when you compare to figure 3 where the interference
is present and the blankers running.
Without blankers it would look as figure 1.
Note the noise floor level level in the wide spectrum.
47 dB in fig 1 and 3 but 23 dB in fig 2.
Further down the page I have tried to explain how the blanker
works - and why. It is not much automated,
The things that affect the blanker are:
The threshold (horizontal bar(s) in the high resolution graph.
The strong signal controls (vertical bars in the high resolution graph)
The number of averages in the wide waterfall.
The number of averages in the wide spectrum.
The selected bin resolution for fft1 and fft2.
Whether second fft uses 16 bit integer or 32 bit float.
73
Leif / SM5BSZ