You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Linrad
I used r1089 in a short cw contest last night. All worked well.
Just an observation on latency compared to v5.00 -- In order to get latency low, I must set DMA rates higher than what I had in v5.00.
Windows seems more sensitive to this than Linux versions. With lower DMA rates, the parameter "buf" in the timing information window gets larger in windows.
I'm passing this hint along here in case others are trying to get low latency in v6.00pre.
73,
John n2nc
Leif Asbrink
unread,
Feb 5, 2025, 9:42:50 AMFeb 5
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to lin...@googlegroups.com
Hello John,
Did you try both with and without Portaudio?
The parameter output delay margin works a bit differently now.
Did you optimise it?
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Linrad
Hello Leif,
I normally use portaudio in windows with v5.00. I will try with and without portaudio and also adjust output delay margin.
Thank you for the tips.
73,
John n2nc
Francesco Cominelli
unread,
Feb 6, 2025, 4:51:25 AMFeb 6
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to lin...@googlegroups.com
Hello Leif. Installed the 1089. Audio works perfectly like the earlier Linrad releases. Fighting on cw delay and until now, altough i modified the DMA parameters, i was not able to find a good result. Suggestions? Many thanks for your kind attention. 73' Francesco, IK2DDR
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to Linrad
Hello Francesco,
What hardware and operating system are you using. I use an Airspy HF+. I can share my settings for low latency/delay if it can help you.
73,
John N2NC
Francesco Cominelli
unread,
Feb 6, 2025, 9:34:05 AMFeb 6
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to lin...@googlegroups.com
Hello John. At least i'm only curious to solve the delay issue, but i'm able to run under WIN10 PRO my linrad releases on Network and usb. Old releases such 3.11, 3.12, 3.13 or 2.43, run with a beautiful sound on cw eme. Anyway i use Afedri . Francesco