I meant CEST - Central Europe Summer Time
Sorry about that
Dear Karl,
4pm CST, meaning 11pm CET? Not sure if I can make it then, although it might be that I’m mistaken because of the conversion :-)
Best,
Tom
Tom Gheldof
Scientific researcher Trismegistos
Ancient History, Faculty of Arts
Blijde Inkomststraat 21 bus 3307
3000 Leuven
tel. +32 16 37 24 95
www.trismegistos.org
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Linked Places" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linked-place...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/linked-places/d7cfbf23-46d9-4ba5-a182-985f815f3f91n%40googlegroups.com.
-- Karl Grossner, PhD Technical Director, World Historical Gazetteer ka...@kgeographer.org @kgeographer
I thought it would be good to see whether there are new and useful insights in recent literature on representing uncertainty in models and visualizations, so I tweeted a request for recommendations and got a few. The first two are ~20 year old favorites from GIScience.
What are others? Is this a useful exercise at this point?
Some background…In 2013 I undertook a project called Topotime with colleague Elijah Meeks at Stanford Libraries. The humanities projects we consulted on there had myriad requirements for modeling and visualizing temporality, so we dove in, no holds barred: seasons, cyclical time, uncertain-interval-within, etc. etc. The work got a very favorable reaction every time I presented it, but when I solicited example datasets to work with I got no offers. Then the Library of Congress developed EDTF (ExtendedDate Time Format), covering much of the ground we had worked on, so I scaled my aspirations way back and began advocating only for the use of 4-part expressions for timespans (earliest start, latest start, earliest end, latest end) – in particular, adding them to GeoJSON. Those found use in the GeoJSON-T and Linked Places formats, and PeriodO uses them as well. They provide formal expression of one type of uncertainty.
When LPF was being developed we (me, Rainer, Richard Light, Graham Klyne) considered having it support at least Level 1 of EDTF, but thought better of it because there was no evidence any gazetteer datasets making their way to WHGazetteer or Peripleo at the time would or could include operators like “?” for uncertain, “~” for approximate, or “%” for both. And LPF was built for the use cases of those projects.
So the options I see (what are others?) are:
OR