testing

17 views
Skip to first unread message

chris dollin

unread,
Nov 28, 2016, 6:09:58 AM11/28/16
to linked-data-api-discuss
This is a test to checking that I can post to the linked data api list.

Chris

--
Chris "allusive" Dollin

Rob Atkinson

unread,
Nov 28, 2016, 3:08:04 PM11/28/16
to linked-data-api-discuss

any thoughts about the future for LDA? 

is it 
a) no further work
b) propose as a standard
c) be replaced by some other standard - and if so what?
d) wait and see

There is a W3C working group on data discovery being discussed - and part of the agenda is the potential for using a HTTP relation for "profiles" [1] - which AFAICT are similar to LDA "views".  There was some discussion about refactoring LDA into a core (url templateing, views, language, type negotiation)  and an extension (query encoding and graph building via parameters).  


Rob Atkinson

--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "linked-data-api-discuss" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to linked-data-api-d...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Dave Reynolds

unread,
Nov 29, 2016, 4:24:01 AM11/29/16
to linked-data...@googlegroups.com
Hi Rob,

Speaking personally I don't think there's any change from the last
discussion on this.

We've no capacity to work on either standardizing LDA or developing an
alternative standard ourselves, at least not without external funding.

Given the overlap between LDP and LDA, plus the various related work
like Hydra, it's not clear to me that an LDA-like spec is something that
would be of interest in W3C.

eLDA on the other hand continues to be supported with bug fixes and
clean ups as and when needed.

Cheers,
Dave

On 28/11/16 20:07, Rob Atkinson wrote:
>
> any thoughts about the future for LDA?
>
> is it
> a) no further work
> b) propose as a standard
> c) be replaced by some other standard - and if so what?
> d) wait and see
>
> There is a W3C working group on data discovery being discussed - and
> part of the agenda is the potential for using a HTTP relation for
> "profiles" [1] - which AFAICT are similar to LDA "views". There was
> some discussion about refactoring LDA into a core (url templateing,
> views, language, type negotiation) and an extension (query encoding and
> graph building via parameters).
>
> [1] https://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc6906
>
> Rob Atkinson
>
> On Mon, 28 Nov 2016 at 22:09 'chris dollin' via linked-data-api-discuss
> <linked-data...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:linked-data...@googlegroups.com>> wrote:
>
> This is a test to checking that I can post to the linked data api list.
>
> Chris
>
> --
> Chris "allusive" Dollin
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "linked-data-api-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it,
> send an email to
> linked-data-api-d...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:linked-data-api-discuss%2Bunsu...@googlegroups.com>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "linked-data-api-discuss" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to linked-data-api-d...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:linked-data-api-d...@googlegroups.com>.
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages