Cestui Que Vie Act 1540 Pdf

[John]

Ledroit de I' Use dans la fodalit anglaise 2 Ses recherches antrieures ont convaincu J. M. W. BEAN que les destines de la noblesse anglaise la fin du Moyen Age dpendaient troitement de dveloppements juridiques qu'il fallait donc, en bonne logique, lucider d'abord. C'est pourquoi M. Bean a consacr l'essentiel du livre qu'il nous offre aujourd'hui tudier l'institution de l'Use, si originale que je renonce lui chercher un quivalent franais et que je me contenterai de la dfinir. A donne son fief B, condition que В dispose des revenus de ce fief, selon la volont de A, au profit de A ou d'un tiers dsign par A : С Le transfert du fief a donc t fait В dans l'intrt ad opus, d'un autre, que les juristes anglais appellent dans leur langue technique, c'est--dire le franais, cestui a que use le feoffment fuit fait, constamment abrg en cestui que use. Prenons

un exemple concret parmi cent autres : en 1372, John Hastings, partant pour la France, donne presque toutes ses terres certaines personnes qui, s'il meurt, devront les consacrer au paiement de ses dettes puis transfrer ce qu'il en restera William Beauchamp. La technique de l'Use, connue ds le milieu du XIIIe sicle, est largement utilise la fin du XIIIe sicle. Mais c'est au XIVe sicle, et en particulier sous Edouard III, qu'elle a le plus gagn, au point de devenir courante. M. Bean fait remarquer non sans pertinence que son dveloppement est contemporain de l'apparition de l'excuteur testamentaire (car qu'est-ce que B, sinon un excuteur testamentaire qui dispose, non pas des meubles du mort, mais de ses terres ?), des guerres franaises et de la Peste noire. Quoi qu'il en soit, У Use a atteint, la fin du XIVe sicle, sa pleine maturit, sauf que, si В trahit la confiance de A et n'excute pas ses volonts, A ou С n'ont encore contre lui aucun recours lgal. Car, en effet, pour les cours de Common Law, В, qui a t bel et bien saisi de la terre, en est le possesseur lgal. Et c'est simplement au dbut du XVe sicle que A et C, s'ils sont lss, trouvent la cour de la chancellerie, qui juge en quit, les voies de droit qui leur manquaient encore. Et bientt les procs rgls en cour de chancellerie sont mme en majorit des procs d'Uss. Ainsi VUse est devenue, la fin du Moyen Age, un des traits caractristiques de la fodalit anglaise. Pourquoi ce succs ? Auparavant, un vassal ne pouvait pas disposer par testament des terres qu'il tenait en fief; ses dettes devaient tre payes sur ses biens meubles, et ses fiefs revenaient tous ensemble son an; si celui-ci tait majeur, il devait payer au seigneur le relief; s'il tait mineur, le seigneur en avait la garde et tenait les fiefs en sa main jusqu' la majorit de son jeune vassal; si enfin l'hritier du dfunt tait une fille non marie, elle ne pouvait prendre poux sans l'autorisation du seigneur, qui savait en tirer un profit financier. Relief, garde, mariage, ces droits fodaux, que les juristes anglais appellent depuis le XVIIe sicle feuda/ incidents, rapportaient gros au seigneur et pesaient lourd sur la fortune du vassal. L'Use permit aux vassaux la fois d'esquiver les droits fodaux et de consacrer leurs fiefs au paiement de leurs dettes, l'tablissement de leurs fils puns et la dotation de leurs

The original purpose and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust was to form a temporary Estate for the benefit of another because some event, state of affairs or condition prevented them from claiming their status as living, competent and present before a competent authority. Therefore, any claims, history, statutes or arguments that deviate in terms of the origin and function of a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust as pronounced by these canons is false and automatically null and void. A Cestui Que (Vie) Trust may only exist for seventy (70) years being the traditional accepted "life" expectancy of the estate.

In 1534, prior to the 1st Cestui Que Vie Act (1540), Henry VIII declared the first Cestui Que Vie type estate with the Act of Supremecy which created the Crown Estate. In 1604, seventy (70) years later, James I of England modified the estate as the Crown Union (Union of Crowns). By the 18th Century, the Crown was viewed as a company. However by the start of the 19th Century around 1814 onwards upon the bankruptcy of the company (1814/15) , it became the fully private Crown Corporation controlled by European private banker families.

By 1815 and the bankruptcy of the Crown and Bank of England by the Rothschilds, for the 1st time, the Cestui Que Vie Trusts of the United Kingdom became assets placed in private banks effectively becoming "private trusts" or "Fide Commissary Trusts" administered by commissioners (guardians). From 1835 and the Wills Act, these private trusts have been also considered "Secret Trusts" whose existence does not need to be divulged.

From 1917/18 with the enactment of the Sedition Act and the Trading with the Enemy Act in the United States and through the United Kingdom, the citizens of the Commonwealth and the United States became effectively "enemies of the state" and "aliens" which in turn converted the "Fide Commissary" private secret trusts to "Foreign Situs" (Private International) Trusts.

In 1931, the Roman Cult, also known as the Vatican created the Bank for International Settlements for the control of claimed property of associated private central banks around the world. Upon the deliberate bankruptcy of most countries, private central banks were installed as administrators and the global Cestui Que Vie/Foreign Situs Trust system was implemented from 1933 onwards.

Since 1933, when a child is borne in a State(Estate) under inferior Roman law, three (3) Cestui Que (Vie) Trusts are created upon certain presumptions, specifically designed to deny the child forever any rights of Real Property, any Rights as a Free Person and any Rights to be known as man and woman rather than a creature or animal, by claiming and possessing their Soul or Spirit.

Since 1933, upon a new child being borne, the Executors or Administrators of the higher Estate willingly and knowingly convey the beneficial entitlements of the child as Beneficiary into the 1st Cestui Que(Vie) Trust in the form of a Registry Number by registering the Name, thereby also creating the Corporate Person and denying the child any rights as an owner of Real Property.

Each Cestui Que Vie Trust created since 1933 represents one of the 3 Crowns representing the 3 claims of property of the Roman Cult, being Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property and the denial of any rights to men and women, other than those chosen as loyal members of the society and as Executors and Administrators.

The Three (3) Cestui Que Vie Trusts are the specific denial of rights of Real Property, Personal Property and Ecclesiastical Property for most men and women, corresponds exactly to the three forms of law available to the Galla of the Bar Association Courts. The first form of law is corporate commercial law is effective because of the 1st Cestui Que Vie Trust. The second form of law is maritime and trust law is effective because of the 2nd Cestui Que Vie Trust. The 3rd form of law is Talmudic and Roman Cult law is effective because of the 3rd Cestui Que Vie Trust of Baptism.

The Birth Certificate issued under Roman Law represents the modern equivalent to the Settlement Certificates of the 17th century and signifies the holder as a pauper and effectively a Roman Slave. The Birth Certificate has no direct relationship to the private secret trusts controlled by the private banking network, nor can it be used to force the administration of a state or nation to divulge the existence of these secret trusts.

As the Cestui Que Vie Trusts are created as private secret trusts on multiple presumptions including the ongoing bankruptcy of certain national estates, they remain the claimed private property of the Roman Cult banks and therefore cannot be directly claimed or used.

While the private secret trusts of the private central banks cannot be directly addressed, they are still formed on certain presumptions of law including claimed ownership of the name, the body, the mind and soul of infants, men and women. Each and every man and woman has the absolute right to rebuke and reject such false presumptions as a member of One Heaven and holder of their own title.

Given the private secret trusts of the private central banks are created on false presumptions, when a man or woman makes clear their Live Borne Record and claim over their own name, body, mind and soul, any such trust based on such false presumptions ceases to have any property.

Any Administrator or Executor that refuses to immediately dissolve a Cestui Que (Vie) Trust, upon a Person establishing their status and competency, is guilty of fraud and fundamental breach of their fiduciary duties requiring their immediate removal and punishment.

Any opinions, findings, conclusions, or recommendations expressed in this material are those of the authors and do not reflect the views of LawTeacher.net. You should not treat any information in this essay as being authoritative.

According to Pettit [2] , Even before conquest, cases have been found of land being conveyed to one man to be held by him on behalf of or to the use of another. Trust developed at the time land ownership in England was based on the feudal system. When a landowner left and went on Crusades, he needed someone to run his estate in his absence, often to pay and receive feudal dues and to look after his family. To achieve this, he would convey ownership of his lands to a trusted person, on the understanding that the ownership would be conveyed back to him on his return. This practice started developing, and landowners saw where they would use such practise for their benefits. Some of the benefits were, to escape some of the feudal dues that fell on the person seized of land, to avoid feudal requirement of forfeiture, to avoid creditors and to effect testamentary disposition of land.

This device of the use led to a decline in feudal dues and as such the Statute of Uses in 1535, was enacted to bar the practise of use, in hope of increasing revenues. As a result, in 1540, the Statute of Wills was enacted to avoid the Statute of Uses. This method of avoidance was to create a use upon a use. This led to the creation of trusts.

3a8082e126