Michael M.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "LiLAX" group.
To post to this group, send email to Li...@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
LiLAX+un...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at http://lilax.net
http://groups.google.com/group/LiLAX?hl=en
I am interested in seeing LiLax active again and going to meetings, but my time is short and a organization meeting I don't have time for. I have faith in those who want to organize to do a good job.
Steve B.
My real concern is it's location. Torrance is so far out of range
it's crazy. If anything we should be LAX since it's in our name.
More importantly the airport is more centrally located and easier for
people from out of town, ie guest speakers and business travelers.
Also there should be a lot of hotels with conference rooms and places
for LiLax to hold meetings.
- Nima
Steve B.
These days you have/had available, were they just last week or are
they on going, i.e. any Tuesday evening, Thursday evening or Saturday
morning?
-Nima
Thanks,
Nima
We are sort of the same group. They splintered off of the old LiLax group and then remerged with the new LiLax group a few years ago as all their leaders seem to leave the User group community or the area. One reason for the reuniting was they split of to Fullerton, but there meetings had migrated back to CSUDH which was just a little ways from where LiLax was meeting. It seemed wrong to have two user groups that close who were both having trouble getting speakers. And at times they were competing for the people.
..lj
> So... Has a new infrastructure, charter and org-chart been defined
> yet?
>
> I would recommend that if a meeting is put together, a major panel to
> discuss these items be a priority :)
>
> Ran into folks from various LUGs at SCaLE 9x and one thing that kept
> coming up was the value of project-driven LUGs.
If you have an opinion or idea, let it be known. However I would rather discuss "Windoze" than a org-chart. If anyone calls meetings with an interesting subject which people show up for is in charge. There, Org-Chart Done. That person and anyone who helps should be thanked (Charter Complete).
..lj
> If you have an opinion or idea, let it be known. However I would
> rather discuss "Windoze" than a org-chart. If anyone calls meetings
> with an interesting subject which people show up for is in charge.
> There, Org-Chart Done. That person and anyone who helps should be
> thanked (Charter Complete).
I suppose that's one way to do things. However, I'm rather a fan of
the following LUGs that are organized, yet also enjoy themselves
(despite having elections and a charter):
Milwaukee LUG: http://www.milwaukeelug.org/
Egyptian LUG: http://eglug.fabrider.net/
Even the Linux Foundation [http://www.linuxfoundation.org/] has
workgroups that have formalities.
I'm not a fan of complexity, either, and subscribe to the "Open Source
Way" [http://www.theopensourceway.org/book/]. However, I just feel
some organization lends to a LUG being more than just a "meet up".
Cheers :)
- Christian Bryant
----- End message from ljsw...@gmail.com -----