Dominant Assurance Contracts in Lighthouse?

49 views
Skip to first unread message

Samuel Patterson

unread,
Jan 22, 2015, 10:10:06 AM1/22/15
to lighthous...@googlegroups.com
Is having dominant assurance contracts a future goal of Lighthouse? Mike, I know you've discussed this in the past but I haven't seen any mention specifically related to Lighthouse (apologies if I'm repeating a common question).

More info:

https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Dominant_Assurance_Contracts

http://mason.gmu.edu/~atabarro/PrivateProvision.pdf

Sam

Mike Hearn

unread,
Jan 22, 2015, 12:03:21 PM1/22/15
to Samuel Patterson, lighthous...@googlegroups.com
No plans to do that at this time.

cameron...@gmail.com

unread,
Jun 2, 2015, 4:52:48 PM6/2/15
to lighthous...@googlegroups.com
We *really* need dominant assurance contracts for lighthouse. It's a real defining feature that will make people actually use it. 
Let know how I can help make this a possibility. 

Mike Hearn

unread,
Jun 3, 2015, 9:28:20 AM6/3/15
to Cameron Ruggles, lighthous...@googlegroups.com
Coding. Lots of coding ;)

And someone would need to design a protocol for it. There's a proposal here but I haven't read it for a while:


Is there a specific reason you want the dominant form rather than any other feature? 
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages