--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Life Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to life...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to life_talk+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/life_talk?hl=en.
Mediocrity is supported in America. Doesn't matter the race. That's why we had a C average president for 8 years. A president that was once a famous actor. America is the place where you can be anything no matter your intelligence. If you have a gimmick and a gift someone will pay you. Most 1st generation & 2nd generation immigrants from poor impoverished country's see the USA as a goldmine of opportunity if you put in the work. To even have a chance of a full Free education in there homeland is hard or almost non existent so when they come here they take full advantage & make their children do so as well. In most countries if you are not from a prestigious background what makes you elite is your job title. Doctor lawyer etc. So they push their children in these professions and to be the best. Americans may push their children or give them every educational support needed. But not just their environment where they live speaks but What they see on tv or online. You get the gist. Because not only Asian or white immigrants work hard but also Africans, west indians
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
I think reading has a lot to do with standardized testing. In that aspect, she is correct. As far as scholastic achievement translates into overall life success, that's debateable. However an articulate well read person isn't always successful past school. In scholastic endeavors, vocabulary and reading comprehension matters a lot, but it's importance is greatly diminished in the adult work force. I'm fairly certain I can read and write competently, but it hasn't translated into better paying jobs or more success.P.S. I was a huge Arthur Conan Doyle fan as a child, definitely read every single Sherlock mystery and most of the Tales of the Knights of the Round Table. I'm still very blue collar, if that...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Life Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to life...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to life_talk+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/life_talk?hl=en.
I think reading has a lot to do with standardized testing. In that aspect, she is correct. As far as scholastic achievement translates into overall life success, that's debateable. However an articulate well read person isn't always successful past school. In scholastic endeavors, vocabulary and reading comprehension matters a lot, but it's importance is greatly diminished in the adult work force. I'm fairly certain I can read and write competently, but it hasn't translated into better paying jobs or more success.P.S. I was a huge Arthur Conan Doyle fan as a child, definitely read every single Sherlock mystery and most of the Tales of the Knights of the Round Table. I'm still very blue collar, if that...
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Life Talk" group.
To post to this group, send email to life...@googlegroups.com.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to life_talk+...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/life_talk?hl=en.
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Achievement disparities are often attributed to socioeconomic factors. According to 2009 data from the Census Bureau, of all children younger than 18 living in families, 15.5 million live in poverty, defined as a family of four with less than $21,947 per year. This includes 4.9 million, or about 10 percent, of non-Hispanic white children, and one in three black and Hispanic children, at 4 million and 5.6 million, respectively (Annie E. Casey Foundation 2011). According to a seminal study of language development in 1995, by age 3, children in poverty have smaller vocabularies and lower language skills than children from middle-income families. Research has also shown that dropout rates tend to be higher for children who live in poverty. According to the U.S. Department of Education’s 2011 Condition of Education report, about 68 percent of 12th-graders in high-poverty schools graduated with a diploma in 2008, compared with 91 percent of 12th-graders in low-poverty schools (NCES, 2011). A recent study by the Annie E. Casey Foundation found that children who both live in poverty and read below grade level by 3rd grade are three times as likely to not graduate from high school as students who have never been poor (Hernandez, 2011).
Researchers have tried to pinpoint why race and class are such strong predictors of students’ educational attainment. In the 1990s, the controversial book, The Bell Curve, claimed that gaps in student achievement were the result of variation in students’ genetic makeup and natural ability—an assertion that has since been widely discredited. Many experts have since asserted that achievement gaps are the result of more subtle environmental factors and “opportunity gaps” in the resources available to poor versus wealthy children. Being raised in a low-income family, for example, often means having fewer educational resources at home, in addition to poor health care and nutrition. At the same time, studies have also found that children in poverty whose parents provide engaging learning environments at home do not start school with the same academic readiness gaps seen among poor children generally (U.S. Department of Education, 2000; Viadero, 2000, Sparks, 2011).