[Licq] #1696: auto-answer does not work to ICQ7

3 views
Skip to first unread message

Licq

unread,
Apr 29, 2010, 2:48:35 PM4/29/10
to licq-t...@googlegroups.com
#1696: auto-answer does not work to ICQ7
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
Reporter: stephan2503 | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: low | Milestone: 1.4.0
Component: build | Version: 1.3.8
Keywords: |
-------------------------+--------------------------------------------------
ICQ7 shows Auto-Answer "Unsichtbar", in englisch "invisible" for licq
state online

--
Ticket URL: <http://www.licq.org/ticket/1696>
Licq <http://www.licq.org/>
Licq - an instant messaging client for UNIX.

Licq

unread,
Aug 3, 2010, 1:22:51 PM8/3/10
to licq-t...@googlegroups.com
#1696: auto-answer does not work to ICQ7
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Reporter: stephan2503 | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: low | Milestone: 1.5.0
Component: Protocol: ICQ/AIM | Version: 1.3.8
Resolution: | Keywords:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------

Comment(by flynd):

Why would you try to fetch an away message from a user that is online? Is
that something new added to the official client?

Does it work properly when Licq is away/na/occupied/dnd or does that also
fail with "invisible"?

--
Ticket URL: <http://www.licq.org/ticket/1696#comment:2>

Licq

unread,
Oct 26, 2010, 11:27:15 AM10/26/10
to licq-t...@googlegroups.com
#1696: auto-answer does not work to ICQ7
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Reporter: stephan2503 | Owner:
Type: defect | Status: closed
Priority: low | Milestone:
Component: Protocol: ICQ/AIM | Version: 1.3.8
Resolution: invalid | Keywords:
--------------------------------+-------------------------------------------
Changes (by flynd):

* status: new => closed
* resolution: => invalid
* milestone: 1.5.0 =>


Comment:

Closing ticket as author is not responding.

If anyone is experiencing this problem and can provide some more details,
please reopen this ticket.

--
Ticket URL: <http://trac.licq.org/ticket/1696#comment:3>

Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages