Idon't know why people insist on encoding screenshots from form-based windows in JPEG. You have very little color variation outside of text, which is typically thin and high-contrast from its surroundings. JPEG's Fourier Transform will cause rippling artifacts in the background, which should be solid color, and will almost definitely have a larger file size. Please, everyone, at least check to see how big a PNG will be before encoding it as JPEG. (In case you notice that I encoded it in JPEG too, that's because re-compressing JPEG artifacts makes PNG's file-size blow up, forcing me to actually need to use JPEG.)
It also makes it a bit more difficult to tell whether a screenshot has been manipulated, because the hitches make everything look suspect. Regardless, BenchLife claims to have a leaked GPU-Z result for the GeForce GTX 1050. They claim that it will be using the GP107 die at 75W, although the screenshot claims neither of these. If true, this means that it will not be a further cut-down version of GP106, as seen in the two GTX 1060 parts, which would explain a little bit why they wanted both of them to remain in the 1060 level of branding. (Although why they didn't call the 6GB version the 1060 Ti is beyond me.)
I would think the GTX 1050
I would think the GTX 1050 would come with performance about 5-10% faster than a GTX 960. With the current state of the video card landscape, anything less is a complete waste.
600 series had 13 models, 700 series had 16 models and 900 series had 6 models. Tsk, tsk. You sounded cool bashing on Nvidia but was a little short on facts. Looks like after 700 series Nvidia got a lot less segmented. So far with Pascal this seems to be the case as well.
3a8082e126