>>For what is worth, we use cmake in FEMhub (femhub.org) as a standard
>>package and we never had any problems with that.
>
> If CMake was widely used (and hence can be listed as a prerequisite for
> building Sage - like gmake, bash etc) then it would have no overhead
> for Sage.
CMake is definitely not as widely used as gmake and bash, so I'm
against making it a prerequisite for Sage. In the history of the Sage
project, the only prerequisite that was ever added was gfortran, and
that is really part of GCC (Gnu Compiler Collection), so fairly
standard.
Anyway, as mentioned before, according to this thread:
singular is migrating to CMake. If that really happens, Sage will
have to include CMake, whether we want to or not.
-- William
-- William
>Anyway, as mentioned before, according to this thread:
>singular is migrating to CMake.>Anyway, as mentioned before, according to this thread:
>singular is migrating to CMake.
For good or bad, Singular did not migrate to CMake. There was too much opposition, I guess.