LGPL v2.1

[Aron Griffis]

COPYING says libproxy is under LGPL v2.1 but the website links
to the top-level LGPL v3. Would somebody mind changing the
website to point to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html ?

This might help for potential contributors pursuing permission to
contribute to the project.

Thanks,
Aron

[Nathaniel McCallum]

Unfortunately, this is a defect in googlecode. They only give you one
option for LGPL and it auto-links to LGPLv3. For clarity's sake, the
license is LGPLv2.1+.

Thanks for this catch!

Nathaniel

[Aron Griffis]

Nathaniel McCallum wrote: [Tue Jan 19 2010, 04:37:06PM EST]

>On 01/19/2010 04:34 PM, Aron Griffis wrote:
>>COPYING says libproxy is under LGPL v2.1 but the website links
>>to the top-level LGPL v3. Would somebody mind changing the
>>website to point to http://www.gnu.org/licenses/lgpl-2.1.html ?
>>
>>This might help for potential contributors pursuing permission to
>>contribute to the project.
>
>Unfortunately, this is a defect in googlecode. They only give you
>one option for LGPL and it auto-links to LGPLv3.

Okay, I wondered if this was the case.

>For clarity's sake,
>the license is LGPLv2.1+.

Thanks for the clarification.

Aron