Dawn,
Thank you for that information.
Makes sense to me.
If we put $41M or so into enlarging and updating the existing fieldhouse into a facility that will function well for 50 or more years, we are not going to replace it within my lifetime - say 20 years or more hopefully 30 years. Indeed we may well keep that facility online and providing value for 50 or more years. We are not going to tear down a $41M building before at least towards its end of life. And, in my opinion, we are not going to have two fieldhouses in the same complex. Now to be sure these are not "facts" just my opinion.
Setting aside land for a very large fieldhouse will further constrain the architects who are already trying to deal with a complicated site and limited amount of land. Making things harder for the architects is likely to drive costs up or result in a less desirable building, or some combination. All for a "theoretical maybe building" we won't build for decades, if ever. Shoot, by then we may have another high school, or far less students than we have now - that far into the future, who knows.
So I see these decisions as the right thing to do.
Rod Cole
Precinct 9