MODAL VERBS
|
|
ABILITY | ||
|
|
For an ability in the present we can use CAN or BE ABLE TO. There is no difference in meaning but CAN is more common. | ||
| |||
|
|
For an ability in the past we can use COULD or WAS/WERE ABLE TO. There is a difference in meaning: | ||
|
(a) |
COULD is used for a general ability in the past She could play the piano when she was six. | ||
|
(b)
|
WAS/WERE ABLE TO is used for a particular ability in the past I didn't forget my keys so we were able to unlock the door. | ||
|
(c)
|
COULD can be used for a particular ability in the past when the sentence is negated, or when the lexical verb is a verb of perception I forgot my keys so we weren't able to/couldn't unlock the door. | ||
|
|
COULD HAVE + past participle is used to talk about an action that we had the ability to perform in the past, but that we didn't perform. | ||
| |||
|
|
CAN and COULD do not have non-finite forms (infinitive, -ing or participles) so they cannot we used in tenses or constructions that require those forms. Instead we have to use BE ABLE TO | ||
| |||
|
|
PERMISSION | ||
|
|
To ask for permission we may use CAN (more common, more direct), COULD (more common, less direct, more polite), MAY (more formal), or MIGHT (more formal, less direct). | ||
| |||
|
|
To give permission we may use CAN (more common, more direct),or MAY (more common, less direct, more polite) | ||
| |||
|
|
To TALK ABOUT having permission we may use CAN, COULD or BE ALLOWED TO | ||
| (a) | We use CAN or AM/ARE ALLOWED TO to talk about a permission we have in the present | ||
| |||
| (b) | We use COULD or WAS/WERE ALLOWED TO to talk about a general permission we had in the past | ||
| |||
| (c) | To talk about a particular permission we had in the past we use WAS/WERE ALLOWED TO | ||
| |||
|
|
OBLIGATION AND NECESSITY | ||
|
|
To express an obligation or necessity for an action in the present or the future we can use MUST or HAVE TO. There is a difference in meaning: | ||
|
(a) |
MUST is used when the authority comes from the speaker You must eat your vegetables, I insist. | ||
|
(b)
|
HAVE TO is used when the authority comes from outside the speaker You have to eat your vegetables. The doctor said you need more vitamins. | ||
|
|
MUST does not have a past tense or non-finite forms (infinitive, -ing or participles) so it cannot we used in tenses or constructions that require those forms. Instead we have to use HAVE TO | ||
| |||
|
|
To say that it is obligatory or necessary NOT TO DO something we use MUST NOT (MUSTN'T) | ||
| |||
|
|
To say that it is NOT obligatory or necessary to do something we use DON'T HAVE TO, NEEDN'T or DON'T NEED TO | ||
| |||
|
|
To say that something was NOT obligatory or necessary in the past we use NEEDN'T HAVE + past participle or DIDN'T NEED TO + infinitive.There is a difference in meaning. | ||
| (a) | NEEDN'T HAVE indicates that something was not necessary or obligatory but that it happened anyways. | ||
| |||
| (b) | DIDN'T NEED TO only indicates that something was not necessary or obligatory (we do not know whether it happened or not) | ||
| |||
|
|
POSSIBILITY, PROBABILITY, AND CERTAINTY | |
|
|
To that something is theoretically possible in the present or future we use CAN. For theoretical possibility in the past we use COULD. | |
| ||
|
|
To that something is FACTUally possible in the present or future (that is, that perhaps something is happening or will happen) we use MAY, MIGHT or COULD. They indicate different degrees of possibility (may more likely, COULD less likely.) | |
| ||
|
In the negative we use MAY NOT or MIGHT NOT. In questions we rarely use MAY | ||
| ||
|
|
To that something is FACTUally possible in the past (that is, that perhaps something has happened) we use MAY/MIGHT/COULD HAVE + Past participle. Tosay that something was possible in the past but did not happen we use MIGHT/ COULD + HAVE + Past participle | |
| ||
|
|
To say that something is probable in the present or future we use SHOULD or OUGHT TO. To say that something was probable in the past we use SHOULD/ OUGHT TO + HAVE + Past participle. | |
| ||
|
|
To say that you are sure that something will happen in the present or future we use MUST. To say that you are sure that something has happened in the past we use MUST HAVE + Past participle. | |
| ||
|
|
To say that you are sure that something will NOT happen in the present or future we use can't. To say that you are sure that something has NOT happened in the past we use can't HAVE + Past participle. | |
| ||
Choose one of the following to complete the sentences.
Must have - Might have - Could have - May have - Should have - Can't have