I think the most appropriate word here is intermittent. As defined by Merriam-Webster, intermittent means coming and going at intervals. Whether a natural phenomenon or something occurring by design, something that happens occasionally is intermittent. Your program, then, would work intermittently.
I have been searching for a word, which I'm beginning to doubt exists at all, that describes a person or thing that changes from one state to the opposite of that state frequently, i.e. an adjective describing the binary oscillation of some particular state.
The closest word I have found is bipolar but, as this refers primarily to a mental disorder, I feel its application to things like the weather or someone's cooking is too poetic. I want a word that is more literal.
Bipolar seems to best suggest switching between extremes along the same line or element, the association with mental illness is a consequence of the word bipolar being a good fit because depression and mania are considered polar to each other, like north and south poles in the axis of the earth, etc. Common usage like applying it to mental health does not eliminate the function of the base word, no more than than the issue of being gay has taken on additional meaning over time.
The words fluctuating, vacillating, oscillating, flip-flopping and (constantly) [wavering between X and Y] (as well as their respective nouns and verbs) are also good candidates, as already suggested by others. However, it all boils down to the context in which you want to use the word. Still, the above are good general answers.
According to Wikipedia, the word "Human" refers to all species in the Genus "Homo" of which only Homo Sapiens are extant... however, over the course of prehistorical life, there were possibly 18 different species of within the "Homo" genus.
In Law, the word "Human" is rarely used as modern law already deals with non-human legal entities, such as corporations, governments, and other legal entities that may not be human in nature. Thus the law will usually refer to "legal persons" which covers a singular individual, or collective entity. More archaeic but terms would refer to "people" such as in the U.S. Constitution, where "people" referred to the body of ordinary citizens in all instances of use in the original document AND the Bill of Rights. This distinction in law that ignores biological humanity already makes the law and legal rights of non-humans much easier to protect, since you already do not have to be a human to participate (for example, the U.S. government routinely sues for violations of civil law, and in general legal theory, only the legal entity of "the state" may bring up criminal charges against a criminal defendant (only a legal entity who is actually a human may be penalized with jail time, but all legal persons can suffer fines for criminal behavior).
This can also be an expression of language differences, as happens already in real life where languages may not use the same words when describing nationalities. For example, in the English Language "American" refer to someone or something that is from the United States, however, in most of Spanish speaking, the translated word of "American" refers to someone or something that is of the American Continents (North America, Central, Caribbean, and South America) and "estadounidense" refers to those who are from the United States of America (It's literal translation is United Statesian). On the other side, in the English-speaking world, the word "German" is used to denote people or things from Germany, but in the German Language, the equivalent word is "Deutsh", and the equivalent country is "Deutschland".
Similarly, in your setting, each race could have a race centric name for humans in their own language and their own language uses their race as the basis for all others, so the elvish word for "humanoid" is effectively "elvenoid" and the Orcish word for humanoid is "Orcoid". Since English is a human language, when elves and orcs speak English, they would use humanoid because that is the correct term. One problem bound to arise is that a human suffering from "Dwarfism" is still referred to as a Dwarf in real life, so you might have to work with a member of the actual Dwarf species being offended by this, but the easy work around is that the stereotypical Dwarf culture would not see anything associated with a Dwarf as an insult.
So let's tone that down a little. In a lot of fiction, both fantasy and scifi, people don't talk about species. Instead we tend to use the (technically inaccurate) word "race" to describe other people, even if we don't share compatible genetics. OK, in a lot of fantasy fiction hybrids (half-orcs, half-elves, etc.) are fairly common, so perhaps "race" is technically accurate in those cases, but you get the point.
This encapsulates the important parts without "dehumanizing" (for our meaning of the word; perhaps "depersoning" might be a better fit?) anyone. Using "race" implies that there is a fundamental commonality between all of the included people; whether or not we can breed with them, they're just another type of person who happen to have radically different phenotypes. The elves are a race of tall, delicate people who live a long time. Orcs are a race of strong, brutish people with green blood and emotional control problems. But both are people in those descriptions, not animals, not monsters and definitely not things.
In a world that contains many creatures such as humans, elves, dwarves, orcs, merfolks, etc., there will inevitably exist many, many words describing different subcategories of creatures, depending on how inclusive or how racist (specist?) the speaker is.
Some other terms will be more technical / scientific, or simply more vivid, and thus will be less ambiguous. For instance, "hybrid" or "taur" refers to all creatures which look half-human half-animal, like merfolk and centaurs. But maybe some creatures consider the word "hybrid" to be offensive, because it suggests that a mermaid would be the offspring of a human mating with a fish, whereas obviously that's not the case (or is it?).
If you just need it rarely in a general throwaway manner like in your example, without having any need to draw any attention to it, then the word "people" or something similar would be the best choice.
However, if the differences between your sentient humanoids and non-sentient or semi-sentient beasts is an important part of the setting, or if the similarities between your humanoids is an important plot point, then it might be useful to make up a fictional word to use it in your setting.
However, figuring out a letter combination that forms an anagram isn't a skill everyone possesses. If you're one of those requiring word scramble help, I've got good news for you. It's easy to figure out the missing word, even if you aren't sure about it, especially if you are playing your favorite board game online.
An anagram solver lets you find all the words made from a list of letters presented in any order. You only need to locate the online tool and, in the search bar, enter any letters you can think of, including wild cards.
Want to get even better at the popular word game? Alternatively, you can also use Advanced Options to add in more complexity to your favorite word game. So, you can decide what letter or letter pairs the word should start with, or the letter you will find at the end. A wildcard letter can generate many letter ideas.
The first approach is to unscramble letter combinations to make words. This way tends to be the most commonly sought-after because it's easier to score more points and win when you're not focusing on a specific word.
Online tools to unscramble jumbled words are usually more difficult to find. Often, the easiest way to unscramble a specific word with online help is to use filters. This way, you can limit the results and narrow them down to what you want.
Firstly, you can exploit the mighty syllable. People make words from syllables, not letters. You can merge vowels and consonants and form letter combinations (like suffixes and prefixes) that often go together. This way makes it easier to visualize possible words.
Lastly, the chances are that your language pluralizes words by adding an S in the end. If you're playing Scrabble and have a noisy S, taking up space, you probably can place it as adjacent letters at the end of your next word.
Wait! Before you hit that search button, be sure to double-check your Game Dictionary. Some words may be valid in some games, but not others. Plus, the scoring system varies between games. (You want to make sure your winning word pays off, after all.)
Need to be a little more specific? Our word solver tool also offers four main options for advanced searches: your starting letter, your last letter, the length of your word, and words that contain certain letters. You can use all of these options in any combination you so choose, with the same 20-character limit for each section.
Our word finder tool helps you uncover your best options by finding a winning word or even clearing your tiles entirely. But the next best move is entirely up to you. Think of it as chess, but with letter tiles and without a hit Netflix original series.
Geared toward helping you grow as a player and providing you with the latest data that answers questions no one else has answered yet, our blog is solely focused on the niche interests of the word game community and anticipating the help you might need.
What is the word and pronunciation for God in Aramaic? I saw 'AaLaH' is the pronunciation for God from this link: Aramaic Lexicon and Concordance . Did Jesus uses the word 'AaLaH' for God during his speeches? And also in Aramaic Bible, is this word is used for God?
The translation of the tetragrammaton, YHWH, on the other hand, is "maria"/"morio" (ܡܪܝܐ), usually decomposed as mar-yah, Lord-Yah ("mar", lord, also being used by syriac speaking churches as a title for saints/doctors of the Church: "mor Ephrem" = Saint Ephrem). (Note: this word has nothing to do with the proper name Maria, coming from the Hebrew Mariam)
dafc88bca6