You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to leo-editor
I always thought that formal verification (FV) of programs would be too hard and error prone beyond simple programs. Apparently I was wrong about that, and one reason is that FV should be applied above the program level - e.g., to algorithms.
"TLA+ is a language for modeling software above the code level and hardware above the circuit level. It has an IDE (Integrated Development Environment) for writing models and running tools to check them."
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to leo-editor
Darn, the title was supposed to say "Formal Verification ...".
Edward K. Ream
unread,
May 9, 2024, 2:23:57 PM5/9/24
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to leo-e...@googlegroups.com
On Thu, May 9, 2024 at 9:17 AM Thomas Passin <tbp1...@gmail.com> wrote:
I always thought that formal verification (FV) of programs would be too hard and error prone beyond simple programs. Apparently I was wrong about that, and one reason is that FV should be applied above the program level - e.g., to algorithms.