As a daily user of Leo for well over a decade, I do not (often) use clones. I do understand that clones are a fundamental feature of Leo, but they are rarely useful for me outside of boilerplate code or documentation. Honestly, in most cases where clones would perhaps serve the purposes I have, I usually just write a quick script instead.
On the other hand, I am a heavy user (abuser?) of the Nav pane. Leo would be severely less useful for me without it. I do not find any confusion about clones in the Nav pane when I am using them, but I admit I may not be representative of the cloneless Leonistas out there.
I suspect this thread will reveal two things:
1) Your (Edward) way of heavily using clones to organize your thoughts and code is perhaps less universal than you’d otherwise think, and,
2) A not-insignificant amount of people are somewhere in the middle, using clones ‘occasionally’.
The beauty and power of Leo is in that it offers many ways of customizing itself to its user’s whims. Clones and the Nav pane are both great examples of this, and should be allowed to coexist. It’s not invalid to use Leo without clones any more than it’s invalid to use Leo for PIM and not programming. From my 2013 blogpost, “Leo is Love”.
—>Jake