What has resulted is something new that deserves to be seen as such.
The millions of people that use Visual Studio Code have no idea what Leo is.
But to understand what this extension is about they will at some point encounter two confusing concepts:
This new product needs to have its own wings and direction and need not be forever bound to being backward compatible with a product used by a handful of people (in comparison to the potential market).
Therefore, strongly suggest renaming the product completely to avoid all references to Leo (except as an Import feature). Also use a different file extension for new files but support existing .leo files without fuss. And have a website, one that is modern and simple, together with well produced videos on YouTube,
It is early enough that this change can be made with minimal fuss. Later will be much harder.
My 2 cents.
The millions of people that use Visual Studio Code have no idea what Leo is.
>Leo isn't an idea, it's a Python program.
IMHO, the legacy app ought to be retired as soon as possible.
This thread was about freeing “LeoJS”, but it looks like I waded into an area that didn’t seem controversial at all.Namely, that the new product was built to replace the old.All the past announcements made clear that it was a matter of when, not if:These are from memory, not verbatim quotes, but should be close enough.- LeoJS is the future of Leo- Such and such is the “final release” of Leo- The Visual Studio Code team has far far greater resources for building user interfacesEtc.And I suggested (and suggest) that sooner is better than later for reasons given.Now it’s being stated that “this isn’t going to happen”. Well exactly what is being planned then?If there were ever a time for coy dismissive one liners, that time is long past.Why create FUD on this project?Why build up all this excitement and have sweat poured into building a replacement and then not believe in it enough to stand solidly behind it?Make it make sense.
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/fc83cae1-870e-4679-90e9-ecd185ccbb4dn%40googlegroups.com.
-- In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice. In practice, there is. .... Yogi Berra Theory is when you know everything but nothing works. Practice is when everything works but no one knows why. In our lab, theory and practice are combined: nothing works and no one knows why. ... unknown
Thank you Miles Fidelman for that observation : It is not silly at all!! You are right, although it is the first thing I show in the 'LeoJs features' video, it should be the first (or almost first) thing i write about at the top of the documentation!!
...
>But to understand what this extension is about they will at some point encounter two confusing concepts:
> 1- That “Leo” also refers to another product, (...) Tying these products at the hip by name is strapping the legacy onto millions of users that will never need it.
This is a good point, and I will admit that the 'out of the gate' description of LeoJS in the readme is all laid out in the forefront to be the 'javascript implementation of Leo as a vscode plugin', the goal being to get the Leo user-base's attention and interest, in trying out LeoJS, being a 100% compatible Leo equivalent. (except for being scriptable in JavaScript instead of python)
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "leo-editor" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to leo-editor+...@googlegroups.com.
To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/leo-editor/58c481ef-9ec2-4ce7-aa36-2114a5ac2a5an%40googlegroups.com.
Ok... but it sure would be lot more attractive as a stand-alone app, not a plug-in, and not tied to VS-code.
Again, TiddlyWiki seems the model. In fact... a Leo plug-infor TiddlyWiki would seem a natural!