Dear Rémi,
I added you on Slack. Please feel free to post there in an open channel (#general, #help-wanted, or #random) for questions, discussions, or also promotion of your students work ;) to continue our discussion (I don’t want to spam this mailing list too frequently :) )
Comparison of different lensing codes is of great interest to me, and I am sure to the community at large. I am sure we can all learn a lot from each others codes, design choices and implementations. Each code was originally developed with a bit a different scope in mind and different tasks may be more suited for one or the other code.
There are obviously many ways one could do such comparisons between different codes (choice of complexity in data, choice of complexity in model, numerical precision, sampling precision, priors on initial guess etc) where the different codes have differences and individual advantages or disadvantages relative to each other, but somewhere one needs to start.
Very happy to help out on the usage of lenstronomy. Also simply having an ‘experience report’ of a junior person without prior knowledge of lensing nor any of the software being used can also help identify specific documentation task and other issues in bringing people ‘up to speed’.
Best, and the discussion to be continued on Slack
Simon