Thisone is weird. Im downloading two torrents that are each 30 gigs. I cleared most of the space Id need, with the intention of doing some dvd backup before they finished. This was last night, but this morning all my disk space was gone (I download to a secondary hard drive, so I avoided the system crash). After a bunch of investigation I discovered that while UT showed they had each downloaded 500ish megs, the disk space they were taking up was 20 gigs each. Thinking it had just screwed up a cache dump or something, I deleted the files and started over with my original torrent files. Its now a few hours later, and the 200 megs of torrent 1 are taking up 16.7 gigs, and the 98 megs of torrent 2 are taking up 9 gigs. Now ive been watching there progression, so I can say that its climbing at a steady rate, just far more than the actual data should take. Im not preallocating or anything, so Im stumped.
When ut first writes a file, the entire file has to be created and allocated. With sparse files, this requirement is reduced somewhat, but it will still have to use a lot more space than data you actually downloaded.
File/Folder Properties... Size and Size on Disk represent the total space allocated and the total space utilized on the disk. It doesn't sound like your disks are NTFS, and make sure diskio.sparse_files is TRUE. It is FALSE by default in 1.7
This isn't a matter of allocating the files and backfilling them (besides I have that feature turned off) because when it about 1% of the torrent it bombs out saying the drive is full. I could understand it taking a bit more space while active, but so far Ive seen it taking anywhere from 200 to 14,000 times the space of the actual data. And it is incapable of finishing a torrent. Is it possible to roll back my version to before I updated?
... if you set sparse files and the files are registering (xxx on disk) where xxx is what's been verified good data in uT, the space usage is elsewhere. What do you mean you can't finish a torrent? Does it get stuck @ 99.9% and hashfail or are all torrents experiencing the space ossue? Checking with won't take that long.
Since I have changed the sparse file setting, it is still exhibiting this size discrepancy in size, but the phantom size has not yet reached the end of my drive. Note that the size of the files is neither what ut says has been downloaded or the size of the entire torrent, but is somewhere in between.
if you don't know what it means it's likely they don't apply junctions are also called hard links.. and in device manager you're able to re-path or multi-path NTFS volumes to other places on the hard drive. UNC is another name for networked path instead of c:\, its \\server\C, or whatnot.
im sorry, I should have been more clear in my last response. I HAVE cleared up the space for the two 30 gig torrents. But now EVERY torrent I download takes up wildly more space than the actual file, including the Open office torrent that keeps being pushed as a tester, and even small (
I like the new feature implemented in v1.1.5 where you can choose to move a .torrent file up or down to be downloaded first or last, but it only works for a single .torrent file at a time. Would you be able to do it so you can move the position in the # column for more than one .torrent file at a time? It's kinda hard to move the position for all of my .torrent files one at a time when I have 100+ .torrent files, heh...
I somewhat agree, I'd prefer it if the queue was just global for all tasks instead of just downloading. Better control of what you wanna do first, and you can then sort by the # column and have ALL of your tasks ordered.
Okay so, I figured out you can move more than one .torrent file at a time in my "#" column. The problem is, if I select to files that are right next to each other, when I press the "Up" or "Down" buttons, they get separated from each other. Can you fix this for Torrent's next version, please?
I want to know why we can't move certain torrents to the "bottom" of the list, regardless. If I'm downloading (insert something that you heard was "good" here) season one, and I don't care when it finishes... then I want (insert something which you know is good and you are "caught up" on here) to float to a higher postion than "Malcolm (or whatever you inserted in option one)" season one. I can give (M or whatever) low bandwidth allocation, but I can't make utorrent download "important (see option two)" stuff first and "prospective new series (see option two)" stuff later.
If I type "what's my IP address" in Google, it'll simply give me my IP address, which means that it's no big deal whether a site which offers legitimate torrents knows my IP address, as long as it doesn't expose it publicly... Unless, of course, there's something I am missing.
I'll give a concrete example. Here's the GIMP download link. If you use Windows (or your user agent claims you use Windows), then you'll see an option for downloading the torrent version of the installer. Is downloading that torrent and putting it in a torrent client any more dangerous than hitting "download directly"? If so, why?
Lots of 'torrent sites' that list torrents (and provide links to them) have very prominent annoying scary ads from VPN companies saying that you absolutely must use a VPN when torrenting. This is not true for many people. In my country (UK) most ISPs block access to these torrent list sites (the Pirate Bay is a famous one but there are others). However, you can use Tor Browser to get at the sites and copy the link into a torrent client like Transmission, Deluge, uTorrent, etc. When using Tor Browser which is a modified version of Firefox, it is a good idea to install ad and pop up blockers because a lot of those sites will send a blizzard of popups, adware links, etc, when you first click to search (or anywhere else). You run the risk that agents of copyright owners collect the IP address of everyone sharing files that they want to track. The worst that you can usually expect in my country is a letter from your ISP saying 'you shouldn't do this'.
Torrenting is the most popular form of peer-to-peer (P2P) file-sharing. It requires torrent management software to connect to the BitTorrent network. Such software can be downloaded for free for various devices.
Everyone downloading or uploading the same file is called a peer, collectively known as a swarm. Because of how BitTorrent works, a peer can download a file from several other users simultaneously or upload a file to multiple other users simultaneously.
It is relatively simple to torrent safely and keep your online activity private. Note that while a VPN for torrenting will keep your activity private and safe from prying eyes, you may still be susceptible to malware from some public torrent sites. Follow these five steps to torrent privately with a VPN.
Torrenting without a VPN means your internet service provider (ISP) can see your online activity, including the sites you visit and the content you view. In certain countries, including the US, ISPs can share this information with third parties, including intellectual property owners. A VPN will keep your online activity private from your ISP.
The BitTorrent protocol rose to become the most popular medium for peer-to-peer file sharing in the world after the demise of centralized services like Napster and Limewire. Unlike those services, torrenting is almost completely decentralized save for the trackers that allow users to search and download torrent files and magnet links. Torrent files and magnet links are used to find other users on the network who host the desired file or files but do not actually host those files for downloading.
The BitTorrent protocol is not illegal or unsafe in itself. It is just a means to share any type of file, and plenty of legal torrenting services do exist. The most popular torrent trackers, such as ThePirateBay and KickassTorrents, however, operate in a legal grey area, offering users free access to copyrighted content. Sharing and downloading copyrighted content by BitTorrent or other means is illegal in many countries and can be unsafe since sites, including KickassTorrents, have been shown to host malware.
These trackers would argue that they find and organize information already out there and do not illegally host copyrighted content on their own servers. Just like the BitTorrent protocol itself, they are the means to an end. Not everyone is convinced. Major trackers have come under heavy legal scrutiny from content creators and distributors who argue that they enable and encourage theft.
Comparitech does not condone or encourage any violation of copyright law or restrictions. Please consider the law, victims, and risks of copyright piracy before downloading copyrighted material without permission.
The prosecution of torrent users has been sporadic. The chances of going to court or paying a settlement are pretty slim, but the penalties can be extremely high. The frequency of copyright holders suing torrenters for copyright infringement peaked in the late 2000s. Copyright pirates were sued for wildly disproportionate amounts of money, and most settled out of court.
These public scare tactics shone poorly on the recording and movie industries because they were portrayed as petty millionaires bullying poor college students. Direct lawsuits are much less common today, but the campaign against torrenters is not over.
Now, the job of going after individual copyright pirates has been outsourced to a growing number of small businesses known as copyright trolls. These companies locate torrenters who illegally download copyrighted content through their real IP addresses. They then approach the copyright owners and sign a deal that lets them take legal action on their behalf. Others are hired directly by Hollywood production companies to sniff out pirates.
The most common way to receive a settlement letter is through your internet provider. A copyright troll will go through the court system to subpoena your ISP and force it to email customers with a legal threat and hand over personal details.
3a8082e126