--
--
Robotics in Education - Mailing List
LEGO Robotics Resources available at www.damienkee.com
The aim of this mailing list is connect educators from around the world who have a common interest using robotics in education. We welcome any and all conversation that is on-topic, (and occasionally off-topic!) and strongly encourage all members, regardless of their level of experience, to be a part of the conversation. While we want our member to give their opinions on commercial products so that others may benefit, sales-pitch posts are not permitted.
If in doubt, please ask me off-line first - dam...@damienkee.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "legoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to legoengineering+unsubscribe@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
I looked the motor accuracy up once. Apparently LEGO claims an accuracy of 1 degree for its motors, but people testing them say 3 degrees; I have no idea whether it would make a difference to use degrees or rotations. As Rob says, it would be interesting to test this.
Lana
Neil DeGrasse Tyson
***** CAUTION: This email originated from outside SCPS. *****
DO NOT click links or open attachments unless you recognize the sender and are expecting the information or have verified with a third party that the information is safe! Contact the I.S. Help Desk at 407-320-0350 if you have concerns about unsafe content.
But do 6 rotations have the same accuracy?
We have had many issues trying to get the EV3 to go the same distance repeatedly and accurately (even though we haven't changed anything in the program). It is very frustrating for the students. During FLL practices (and competition) the robot seemed to have a mind of it's own for no apparent reason. They were very careful in placing the robot and even created a measure to place it. Without a line to follow to compensate for any variation, is there a way to be more consistent? Would it be better to set it to move slightly back and forth, even though you want it to go straight? We did not have much luck with the gyro sensor. We even tried measuring the distance from the wall with the ultrasonic sensor but we couldn't get that to work either.
They did well for beginners, they came in 6th out of 192 teams on Long Island, but they could have done better if everything worked consistently and there was a great deal of frustration involved. One thing that we considered is that the movement shakes the parts apart and that slight bit of variation changes the way the robot works, but they tried pressing everything back into place each time and still had problems.
Any advice or suggestions
would be greatly appreciated.
Christine
We actually made a point of not having the robot go too fast, since we noticed that could be an issue. We also tried to make it fairly symmetrical. The problem was it would work perfectly, sometimes many times in a row and then not.
So is there any reliable way to stop slippage? It seems that many of the competition robots that have won use the box design. Does that lock in the wheels better to prevent any wobbling? Are there any plans around for that type of robot to look at and play with as a starting point?
Christine
Hi Christine,
I’ll chime in here with some observations reported by my FLL team…
We prevent wobble by supporting the drive axle in 2-3 places on each wheel, ideally on each side of the motor and on the outside of the tyre. The box design helps with this build, but it’s not the only way to go.
In terms of error on the mat, my team runs a “Robot FIRST Aid” program at tournaments. Once you remove code issues (dead reckoning, errors etc) we’ve found that the biggest causes of slippage/bad performance are:
My team minimises the chance of slippage through code (e.g. gradual acceleration) and robot design (e.g. balance, wheel support), and then writes programs that can cope if slippage occurs. I don’t think we’ve come up with a design that guarantees slippage will not occur 😊.
Let me know if you’d like to discuss further. My team would love the chance to make some new friends from the USA!
Regards,
Andrew Clark
Lead Mentor
Project Bucephalus
If in doubt, please ask me off-line first - da...@damienkee.com
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "legoengineering" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to legoengineeri...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.