Re: Email dated February 28, 2022 Complaints

[tai building lee]

tai building lee <leetaib...@gmail.com> 於 2022年3月7日 週一 上午1:01寫道：

Re: Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public Areas and/or Common Areas/Common Parts at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong and/or Other Public Areas and/or Common Areas/Common Parts of Lee Tai Building by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building and Complaints about the Noises and Vibrations caused by the Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號：2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號：EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. 投訴太子道西101-107號利泰大廈地下食肆抽風系統 (檔案編號：2-4933763902 assigned by FEHD) Re: 就有關太子道西101-107號利泰大樓相關事宜, 根據基本法第73條向屋宇署提出質詢 Re.: Raising questions to the Buildings Department as per Article 73 of the Basic Law regarding the matters relating to Lee T

tai building lee <leetaib...@gmail.com>	2022年2月28日 下午4:43 (7 天前)
寄給 info、 nytnews、 raxon、 kdelguzzi、 maribel、 cbohan、 sfirey、 customerservice、 mike、 circ、 community、 tips、 media、 hello、 admin、 investors、 MZADRIMA、 security、 anne.mcmahon、 thom.clayton、 paul.burton、 customercare、 editor、 Letters、 health-feedback、 acw、 militaryhistory、 mhq、 vietnam、 wildwest、 worldwar2、 comments、 guitarworld、 damian.fanelli、 jackson.maxwell、 sam.roche、 matthew.owen、 customerservice、 feedback、 editorialadmin、 theweek、 ai、 editor、 support、 maguiree、 letters、 letters、 letters、 advertising、 themail、 tips、 tips、 kat.yeung、 info、 ahy.choi、 events、 jspeed、 accessibility、 service、 letters、 letterstt、 newspro、 service、 ebook、 vaservice、 alliance、 pr、 service、 member、 reader、 marketing、 shannen.yang、 joe.tsai、 ydns、 digital、 idnmis.f3305、 eddahuang、 taiwandaily228、 davidyen1470、 web、 news、 cs、 public、 services、 cnafnc2、 videocna、 taiwannewseditor、 press、 contact

To: THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION (HKSAR) including, but not limited to:

To: The Chief Executive of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (HKSAR)
Office of the Chief Executive
Patty Mak
Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as the HKSAR Government), People's Republic of China
Address : Tamar, Hong Kong
Telephone : (852) 2878 3300; Fax : (852) 2509 0580
E-mail: c...@ceo.gov.hk

To: The Chief Secretary for Administration

To: The Development Bureau of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as the Development Bureau)
dev...@devb.gov.hk

To: The Buildings Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as BD or the Buildings Department)
E-mail Address: rec...@bd.gov.hk
                        enq...@bd.gov.hk
                        tel...@1823.gov.hk
Telephone Number: 1823 or 26261616
https://www.bd.gov.hk/en/index.html
     
To: The Fire Services Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as FSD)
E-mail Address: hkfs...@hkfsd.gov.hk
                          lcpo...@hkfsd.gov.hk
                          lck...@hkfsd.gov.hk
Telephone Number: 2723 8787 or 2302 5339
https://www.hkfsd.gov.hk/eng/index.html

To: The Food and Health Bureau of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region
Attn.:  Secretary for Food and Health
           Ms. Chan, Ms. Kwong Ms. Leung
Email Address enq...@fhb.gov.hk
Mailing Address Secretary for Food and Health
18/F, East Wing, Central Government Offices,
2 Tim Mei Avenue, Tamar, Hong Kong
Telephone (852) 35098765
Fax (852) 25413352

To: The Food and Environmental Hygiene Department of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as FEHD)

To: The Environment Protection Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as EPD)
E-mail Address:   hotl...@epd.gov.hk
                          enq...@epd.gov.hk
                          mar...@epd.gov.hk
Telephone Number: 2838 3111, 2150 8020
https://www.epd.gov.hk/epd/english/top.html

To: The Electrical and Mechanical Services Department of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as EMSD)
E-mail Address: in...@emsd.gov.hk
Telephone Number: 1823 or 2333 3762
https://www.emsd.gov.hk/en/home/index.html

The Hong Kong Police Force of the Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region (hereinafter referred to as the Police)
Mong Kok District, 142 Prince Edward Road West, Kowloon
Telephone Number: 3661 1642
Email: crim...@police.gov.hk
https://www.police.gov.hk/ppp_en/contact_us.html#KWRR

To: Home Affairs Department (hereinafter referred to as HAD)
By E-mail: bm_...@had.gov.hk
By Telephone: (852) 2835 2500
By Fax: (852) 2147 0984
By Post: Division IV
Home Affairs Department
31/F., Southorn Centre, 130 Hennessy Road, Wan Chai, Hong Kong
1/F, Mong Kok Government Offices, 30 Luen Wan Street, Mong Kok, Yau Tsim Mong  (Tel: 2399 2155)
Ms. Iris Ng; Tel: 23992140; E-mail: iris_...@had.gov.hk
https://www.buildingmgt.gov.hk/en/comments_and_enquiry/11_3.htm
To: The Duty Lawyer

To: Department of Justice

To: Office of The Ombudsman, Hong Kong
Address: 30/F, China Merchants Tower, Shun Tak Centre,
168-200 Connaught Road Central, Hong Kong
Post Box G.P.O. Box No. 3300, Hong Kong
Enquiry and Complaint Hotline: (852) 2629 0555
Fax: (852) 2882 8149
Complaint email address: compl...@ombudsman.hk
Enquiry email address: enq...@ombudsman.hk

To The Legislative Council of HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office of the Legislative Council Secretariat of HKSAR and all members of the Legislative Council of HKSAR

To: The Democratic Party of Hong Kong and WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), Legislative Council Member, chairman of Hong Kong's Democratic Party

To: The Democratic Party
Attn.: James TO Kun-sun
Office address :   Room A1, 2/F, Rodeo Centre,
73-79 Larch Street, Tai Kok Tsui, Kowloon
Office telephone : 2789 8833
Office fax : 2391 6882
E-mail : jksto...@gmail.com
   
To: The Democratic Party
      Office of Mr. LAM Cheuk Ting
Attn.: Mr. LAM Cheuk Ting and Mr. Chan
Tel. No. : 2650 0040
E-mail Address: dp...@dphk.org  

To: The Democratic Party
Attn.: Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan
http://www.wongpikwan.com
Tel. No. : 2390 0089
helena...@gmail.com
helenaw...@dphk.org

To: Ms WONG Shu Ming, MH
Former District Councillor of Mong Kok North (E13)
To: Ms. Wong at 59957832
To: Ms. Chan at 59957923
Address: Room A, 5/F, Silvercorp International Tower, 707-713 Nathan Road, Mong Kok, Kowloon
Tel. No.: 3541 9863,  Fax No.: 3541 9869
E-mail Address: mkn...@yahoo.com.hk

To: Registrar
The Hong Kong Institute of Architects, Hong Kong SAR (HKIA)
19/F., One Hysan Avenue
Causeway Bay, Hong Kong
Tel.: 2511 6323
Fax : 2519 6011 2519 3364
Email : in...@hkia.net / hki...@hkia.org.hk
Website: www.hkia.net

To: The Architects Registration Board
Address: 19th Floor, One Hysan Avenue, Causeway Bay,
Hong Kong.
Tel : 2511 5794
Fax : 2519 6011     2519 3364

To: The Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building and its lawyer(s) and Homechant Limited

Re: Complaints about the Unauthorized Use of the Public Areas and/or Common Areas/Common Parts at Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong and/or Other Public Areas and/or Common Areas/Common Parts of Lee Tai Building by the Owner/Tenant of G/F and M/F of Lee Tai Building and/or Other Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building and Complaints about the Noises and Vibrations caused by the Relevant Owners/Tenants of Lee Tai Building [檔案編號：2-4933763902 (assigned by 1823)] [檔案編號：EP3/K03/RE/00034760-18 (assigned by EPD)] The case number assigned by The Ombudsman is OMB2019/1791. 投訴太子道西101-107號利泰大廈地下食肆抽風系統 (檔案編號：2-4933763902 assigned by FEHD)
Re: 就有關太子道西101-107號利泰大樓相關事宜, 根據基本法第73條向屋宇署提出質詢
Re.: Raising questions to the Buildings Department as per Article 73 of the Basic Law regarding the matters relating to Lee Tai Building at 101-107 Prince Edward Road, Kowloon, Hong Kong

Re: Complaints against THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION (HKSAR), the relevant government bureaus of HKSAR and the relevant government departments of HKSAR including, but not limited to, those government bureaus and government departments listed above and the Legislative Council of HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office of the Legislative Council Secretariat of HKSAR and all members of the Legislative Council of HKSAR

Please note and respond to the matters stated below and take proper actions accordingly and immediately:

Section A: With respect to all the matters relating to the captioned and/or mentioned in my previous e-mails sent to you or some of you from 2018 onwards, I hereby confirm again that I would only pursue those complaints which do not violate any law and are not against any law. In other words, I would not pursue any complaints/matters which may/would violate any law or may/would be against any law.

Section B: I hereby repeat what I have been repeating many times, as the relevant parties are still ignoring the relevant matters. More than three years have passed since 2018, but the matters mentioned above have not yet been satisfactorily resolved. Indeed, much time, resources, and energy of the relevant parties listed above (i.e., all of you) can be saved, if you are willing to ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following simple question and demand 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 to do the following:
# Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law and/or the relevant laws, including, but not limited to, CAP 123 and CAP 344 ( https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) of the Laws of Hong Kong, etc..
The relevant government departments and the Legislative Council have the powers and duties to ask 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 the question marked with # above and demand 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 to provide the relevant evidence under the law for reasons I have been repeating in my previous emails sent to you from 2019 onwards.
Article 73 of the Basic Law is as follows:
The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions:
.................................
( 5 ) To raise questions on the work of the government;
( 6 ) To debate any issue concerning public interests;
...................................
( 8 ) To receive and handle complaints from Hong Kong residents;
...............................................
( 10 ) To summon, as required when exercising the above-mentioned powers and functions, persons concerned to testify or give evidence.
https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclaw/chapter4.html
https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclaw/index.html
https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/filemanager/content/en/files/basiclawtext/basiclaw_full_text.pdf

Subsection 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance is as follows:
16.Grounds on which approval or consent may be refused
(1)The Building Authority may refuse to give his approval of any plans of building works where—
...........................................................................
(d)the carrying out of the building works shown thereon would contravene the provisions of this Ordinance or of any other enactment, or would contravene any approved or draft plan prepared under the Town Planning Ordinance (Cap. 131);
https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001

"Any other enactment" in subsection 16(1)(d) of Cap. 123 Buildings Ordinance stated above clearly includes CAP. 344 Building Management Ordinance ( https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) of the Laws of Hong Kong and any other enactment.
However, the relevant government departments and the Legislative Council refuse to ask 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 the simple question marked with # above and/or refuse to order 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law and/or the relevant laws, including, but not limited to, CAP 123 and CAP 344 ( https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ) of the Laws of Hong Kong, etc.. Instead, the relevant government departments and Legislative Council members advise the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building that it may lodge a lawsuit to the Court against the relevant parties with respect to the matters mentioned above, if necessary. For example, BD advises us that the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building has the right to lodge a lawsuit to the Court against the relevant parties to resolve the matters mentioned above, if necessary, and then BD would follow the decision of the Court with respect to such matters, if any. With respect to such matters, BD is very confused, and such opinion or attitude of BD is completely incorrect for reasons as follows.
In short, some of the duties of the Court are to ascertain and decide whether BD has been executing its duties correctly. The Court is not responsible for teaching BD what BD should do, as, generally speaking, BD must be competent enough to fulfill its duties or make decisions under the law without any aid or advice of any Court/Tribunal. Of course, BD may seek legal advice from lawyers for the matters mentioned above, but this does not mean that BD is to rely on the decision of the Court for the execution of its duties or making decisions. Generally speaking, if BD relies on the decision of the Court for the execution of its duties or making decisions, then BD cannot effectively and efficiently execute its duties in suitable time, because it would take the Court a lot of time to arrive at its decisions! It is presumed that the public, the relevant government departments/bureaus and the members of the Legislative Council etc. understand the correct interpretation of the relevant laws without the aid of the Court. Rule of law would be just a joke, if only the Courts are able to interprete the laws correctly! As the property management companies must be able to ascertain the exact location and extent of the common parts/common areas of the buildings which they manage without the aid of the Court, BD must be able to ascertain the exact location and extent of the common parts/common areas of the relevant buildings without the aid of the Court, when necessary. Indeed, BD would not be able to carry out many duties properly, if it is not able to ascertain the exact location and extent of the common parts/common areas of the relevant buildings without the aid of the Court. For example, BD must be able to identify the relevant parties and issue the relevant orders to them for removal of illegal structures efficiently, but BD cannot do so, if it is not able to ascertain the exact location and extent of the common parts/common areas of the relevant buildings without the aid of the Court. As such, BD must be able to interprete the Deed of Mutual Covenant (DMC) of any relevant building correctly without the aid of the Court.
Before the relevant government departments and/or the Legislative Council members advise the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building that it has the right to lodge a lawsuit to the Court against the relevant parties, they must:
a. find out and ascertain the relevant facts, evidence, agreements and principles, etc.,
b. understand the correct interpretation of the relevant laws and
c. understand all the relevant powers and duties of the relevant parties/government departments/Legislative Council members etc. under law.
Otherwise, the relevant government departments and Legislative Council members would be compelling the relevant parties to get into lawsuits foolishly and abuse the Court.
Even if the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building can win the lawsuits with respect to the matters mentioned above and/or before, other parties may make applications similar to those of 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 to BD again and again and the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building is then compelled to lodge similar lawsuits with respect to similar matters to the Court again and again, if the malpractice/opinion/attitude of BD mentioned above is not corrected. There is no end to it, if the malpractice/opinion/attitude of BD mentioned above is not corrected.
Practically, the decisions of the Court with respect to the lawsuits mentioned above would not be useful for BD for most of the time, because those decisions of the Court may become inapplicable as time passes and/or the relevant circumstances may change with time. The owners of Lee Tai Building may change their mind from time to time. God knows! BD has not yet thought through what it should do with respect to the matters mentioned above!
Generally speaking, if applicants like 富臨集團的正冬火鍋料理 want to obtain the relevant consent from the Incorporated Owners of the relevant buildings, they would request the Incorporated Owners of the relevant buildings to sign some written agreements to protect themselves, as the relevant applications to the government departments, alteration and addition and/or minor works etc. are big investments for any business/food business! For example, the duration of the consent (e.g., 2 years, 5 years or 10 years etc.?) must be stated in such agreements. When was the meeting of the owners of the relevant building relating to such consent held? For each of the written agreements mentioned above, the record of such kind of owners' meeting must be part of such written agreement. Moreover, a drawing indicating the exact location and extent of the relevant common part(s)/common area(s), the use of which by the relevant applicant is agreed by the relevant incorporated owners (Building Owners' Corporations as per CAP. 344), must be part of such kind of written agreement. However, we do not have such kind of agreement for Lee Tai Building and the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building has not received any money from 富臨集團的正冬火鍋料理 with respect to the use of the Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building for the installation of the air conditioning/ventilation system mentioned above. Such kind of agreement, if exists, can never be secret agreement, because all the terms of such kind of agreement must have been discussed in the relevant meetings of the owners of the relevant building as per CAP. 344 Building Management Ordinance! But there is no record of any of such meetings for Lee Tai Building! Indeed, the owners of Lee Tai Building have never held any meeting as per CAP. 344 Building Management Ordinance for allowing 富臨集團的正冬火鍋料理 to use the Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building for the installation of the air conditioning/ventilation system mentioned above!
Bear in mind that, though it is presumed that the owners of any buildings understand their rights and duties with respect to the relevant common parts/common areas of the buildings, actually many of the owners of the buildings did not/do not understand such rights and duties, or they did not/do not know what they should do or how to seek proper advice, when building management problems arise/arose. As such, it may take the owners of the buildings very long time to realize whether there is building management problem and what they should do for such problem, if any!
While we do not have evidence which shows without any doubt that 富臨集團的正冬火鍋料理 has obtained consent from the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building for using the Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building for installing the air conditioning/ventilation system mentioned above, there are clear pieces of evidence that show that the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building did not and does not consent to 富臨集團的正冬火鍋料理 using the Mezzanine Floor (M/F) of Lee Tai Building for installing the relevant parts of the air conditioning/ventilation system mentioned above or any other purposes, the copies of the letters from the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building and/or Homechant Limited mentioned before being referred to.
With respect to item no. 4 in the attached letter dated 16 January 2020 from the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building and Homechant Limited to 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下), the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building and Homechant Limited have been demanding 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to restore the wall of the Entrance Lobby (Lobby Right of Way) at M/F of Lee Tai Building shown in the attached photo named 'Entrance Lobby at MF of Lee Tai Building 1' as per the attached floor plan showing the original layout of the Entrance Lobby (Lobby Right of Way) at M/F of Lee Tai Building by constructing a reinforced concrete wall at the existing rectangular wall opening shown in such photo to block the access from 正冬火鍋料理 to the Entrance Lobby (Lobby Right of Way) at M/F of Lee Tai Building through such wall opening.

Compare the attached floor plan showing the original layout of the Entrance Lobby (Lobby Right of Way) at M/F of Lee Tai Building with the attached photos named as follows:

- photo named 'Entrance Lobby at MF of Lee Tai Building 1'
- photo named 'Entrance Lobby at MF of Lee Tai Building 2'
- photo named 'Entrance Lobby at MF of Lee Tai Building 3'

However, 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) has not yet complied with the demand of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building and Homechant Limited stated above.

The only way to resolve the problems mentioned above is to order 富臨集團的正冬火鍋料理 to remove the parts of the air conditioning/ventilation system at M/F as shown in the relevant photos sent to you previously and restore the wall at M/F of Lee Tai Building mentioned above by the relevant government departments/bureaus including, but not limited to BD, FSD and/or FEHD etc. according to laws, including, but not limited to, CAP. 123 Buildings Ordinance including, but not limited to, subsection 16(1)(d) of CAP. 123 Buildings Ordinance, Cap. 344 Building Management Ordinance and other relevant enactments for reasons I repeated many times.

Section C: I hereby confirm that I would continue to pursue all the complaints against the relevant parties lodged to you and mentioned before for reasons stated in my previous emails sent to you from 2018 onwards and/or this email on condition that all the conditions stated in Section A above are fulfilled.

Section D: Particularly, among all my complaints, I would continue to pursue the relevant complaints against the HKSAR government, the relevant government bureaus, and/or the relevant government departments lodged to you and mentioned before for reasons stated in my previous emails sent to you from 2018 onwards and/or this email or below on condition that all the conditions stated in Section A above are fulfilled.
Some of the reasons for my complaints mentioned above are as follows:
Among other things, the relevant government bureaus and/or the relevant government departments fail to answer questions raised by members of the Legislation Council as per Article 64 of the Basic Law.
Article 64 of the Basic Law is as follows:
The Government of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region must abide by the law and be accountable to the Legislative Council of the Region: ........ it shall answer questions raised by members of the Council; .........
https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclaw/chapter4.html
For example, BD has not yet properly responded to the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), former Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong. Copies of such letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 were sent to you previously and a copy of such letter is attached to this email again for your easy reference.
Also, the relevant government bureaus and/or the relevant government departments fail to handle and respond to my complaints mentioned above properly for reasons I mentioned before.
As all people in Hong Kong must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong etc., both the staff of the Buildings Department and the Legislative Council members must understand the Basic Law and the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong ( https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001 ) and the relevant sections/subsections of CAP 344 Building Management Ordinance ( https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap344 ), etc.. Clearly, for reasons mentioned in this email and/or mentioned before in my previous e-mails, the Buildings Department has been violating the laws of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, subsection 16 (1)(d) of CAP 123 of the Laws of Hong Kong and Article 64 of the Basic Law, etc..
https://www.elegislation.gov.hk/hk/cap123?xpid=ID_1438402641778_001
https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclaw/chapter4.html

Section E:  I hereby confirm that I would continue to pursue all the complaints against the Legislative Council of HKSAR, the Public Complaints Office of the Legislative Council Secretariat of HKSAR and the former members of the Legislative Council of HKSAR including, but not limited to, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong lodged to you and mentioned before for reasons stated in my previous emails sent to you from 2018 onwards and/or this email on condition that all the conditions stated in Section A above are fulfilled.
Briefly, I have lodged my complaints against the parties/former members of the Legislative Council mentioned above in this section E, partly because they fail to execute their powers and duties as per Article 73 of the Basic Law in the ways mentioned in my previous e-mails sent to you including my previous e-mail dated 08 June, 2020, my previous e-mail dated 14 June, 2020 and other previous e-mails with respect to the captioned complaints and/or my complaints against the relevant legislative councillors of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) etc.. For reasons mentioned before in my previous e-mails and/or in this e-mail, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) fail to execute their powers and duties as per sections/subsections 5, 6, 8 and 10 etc. of Article 73 of the Basic Law, partly because they have not yet summoned 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify or give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the complaints stated above and have not yet asked 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question and have not yet demanded 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 to provide the relevant evidence as follows:
# "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law."
Moreover, Mr. LAM Cheuk Tin, Mr. James TO Kun-sun, Dr. Helena Wong Pik-wan and Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉) have been failing to compel/urge the Buildings Department to properly respond to my e-mails mentioned before and/or the relevant correspondence/e-mails from the Democratic Party of Hong Kong including, but not limited to, the letter dated 05 June, 2020 from the Democratic Party of Hong Kong to the Buildings Department of the Hong Kong SAR mentioned above and/or those e-mails and/or the relevant correspondence attached to this email and/or listed in my Tables of Appendices sent to you previously as per Article 73 of the Basic Law.
Article 73 of the Basic Law is as follows:
The Legislative Council of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region shall exercise the following powers and functions:
.................................
( 5 ) To raise questions on the work of the government;
( 6 ) To debate any issue concerning public interests;
...................................
( 8 ) To receive and handle complaints from Hong Kong residents;
...............................................
( 10 ) To summon, as required when exercising the above-mentioned powers and functions, persons concerned to testify or give evidence.

https://www.basiclaw.gov.hk/en/basiclaw/chapter4.html

Section F: I hereby lodge my complaints against all former and/or current members of the Legislative Council including, but not limited to, Priscilla LEUNG Mei-fun (梁美芬議員) and Junius HO Kwan-yiu (何君堯議員) for reasons as follows:
Priscilla LEUNG Mei-fun (梁美芬議員) and Junius HO Kwan-yiu (何君堯議員) refuse to execute their powers and duties as per subsections (5), (6), (8) and (10) of Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to my complaints. Particularly, they refuse to summon 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) to testify or give evidence as per Article 73 of the Basic Law with respect to the complaints stated above and refuse to ask 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) the following question and refuse to demand 富臨集團有限公司 and 正冬火鍋料理 to do the following:
# "Has 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) obtained the consent of the Incorporated Owners of Lee Tai Building as per Cap 344 Building Management Ordinance for converting the relevant common parts of Lee Tai Building in the way mentioned before for its own use? If so, 富臨集團有限公司/正冬火鍋料理 (旺角太子道西103號地下) is to provide all the relevant evidence(s) as per Article 73 of the Basic Law."
Priscilla LEUNG Mei-fun (梁美芬議員), Junius HO Kwan-yiu (何君堯議員) and other former and/or current members of the Legislative Council fail to respond to my complaints properly and fail to act accordingly and properly for my complaints, as none of the issues/matters/complaints referred to above is satisfactorily resolved.

Section G: Anyway, I would like to request all of you to handle the issues/matters/complaints mentioned in my previous e-mail dated 2020年11月23日 to you first. In short, please request BD to respond to the questions in the letter dated 05 June, 2020 with reference no.: SFS-2020-CNY-160 from Mr. WU Chi-wai (胡志偉), former Legislative Councillor of the Democratic Party of Hong Kong, to the Buildings Department of Hong Kong properly first. A copy of such letter is attached to this email again.

Copies of some relevant e-mails and letters mentioned above are attached to this e-mail and/or my subsequent e-mails to you for your easy reference. Of course, they are not exhaustive.
Please respond to the matters mentioned above immediately.
Please, via email, notify me of any mistake(s) found in any of my emails sent or to be sent to you, if any.
I do not consent to the disclosure of any part of any information sent or to be sent to you by me to anyone except the personnel handling my complaints, because I have to protect my privacy.

This email is written by and sent from the owner of a flat in Lee Tai Building to the relevant bureaus and departments of THE GOVERNMENT OF THE HONG KONG SPECIAL ADMINISTRATIVE REGION and other relevant parties mentioned above.
My mobile phone number is **.

[tai building lee]

[tai building lee]

tai building lee <leetaib...@gmail.com> 於 2022年3月7日 週一 上午1:25寫道：

[tai building lee]

tai building lee <leetaib...@gmail.com> 於 2022年3月7日 週一 上午1:28寫道：