> Apparently attempting to send something coherent helped me gain a little
> clarity; the problem shown in my paste is probably because one of the mingw
> system headers contains
> #define VOID void
> Would it be a problem to use a different name in the enum?
How about at the top of value.h you just add this:
#if defined(VOID)
#undef VOID
#endif
Does that work? If so, I can check that in.
John
> More broadly, I wonder if this 'should' work? I guess in the sense, do you
> expect that minimal changes should be enough to successfully compile with
> mingw32?
I have no reason off-hand to believe that it shouldn't work.
John