AI investments represent a major part of the administrationās approach to American competitiveness, and new tools are being increasingly used by schools for everything from lesson plans to helping school therapists handle overwhelming student caseloads. Some schools have even reduced instruction time by relying on AI.
Ā
Yet, rules about AI are still being written. Itās whatās led students to lobby to tame some of the darker sides of the technology.Ā
Ā
The majority of state attorneys general have entreated AI companies to build better protections for students. And some criticize existing state guidelines around AI for not focusing enough on issues like deepfakes and the potential to increase police interaction with students.Ā
Ā
But how much of a voice students ā or even states ā should have in shaping those rules is contested. For instance, last week saw a new executive order that will likely push states to avoid regulating AI.Ā
Ā
It was not necessarily received well. For example, Becky Pringle, president of the labor union National Education Association, called the order a ārecklessā attempt to sideline experts and consolidate power in the hands of Big Tech, in a statement sent to reporters.
Ā
The order does not specifically mention K-12 schools, and some say its impact on schools will be indirect. But a provision in the order threatens to pull away federal funding from states that regulate AI. This might not actually shift the state guidelines for schools specifically, but states may be more reluctant to regulate AI in ways the administration wonāt like, because they could potentially lose ānondeployment funds,ā says Doug Casey, executive director of Connecticutās Commission for Educational Technology. This money ā sometimes used to buy computers, Wi-Fi or hot spots, in ways that impact students ā can be significant.Ā
Ā
Some note that this move sits uncomfortably with the Trump administrationās calls to āsend education back to the states.ā And for others, itās prevented clarity for schools.
Ā
āFederal preemption is appropriate only when it establishes a clear, well-designed, widely accepted federal alternative,ā wrote Keith Krueger, CEO of CoSN, a school tech leaders professional association, in an email to EdSurge. Instead, this order āappears to displace state AI oversight without providing a meaningful federal framework to replace it.āĀ
Ā
ā Daniel Mollenkamp, EdSurge reporter