For condensation analysis at a point bridge the parallel path is too conservative so 3D is probably the only way to get realistic results.
Yalin
Iso15099 limits this to bridges that are 10% and some other limitations in the manual. It is all pretty cut and dry for uvalue.
If the goal is to obtain accurate temperature distribution that is obviously not possible for a 2D model to give a 3D temperature result.
What is the result you need? Temperature or the heat uvalue?
Yalin