Pro Tools Free Version

0 views
Skip to first unread message

Kevin

unread,
Aug 5, 2024, 4:14:44 AM8/5/24
to lbefarorav
AnMSBuild toolset includes a microsoft.common.tasks file, a microsoft.common.targets file, and compilers such as csc.exe and vbc.exe. Most toolsets can be used to compile applications to more than one version of the .NET Framework and more than one system platform. However, the MSBuild 2.0 Toolset can be used to target only the .NET Framework 2.0.

The MSBuild ToolsVersion attribute on the Project element in Visual Studio and MSBuild project files is considered obsolete in Visual Studio 2019 and later; you can safely delete it. This article describes its use in older versions of MSBuild, or for custom toolsets. See Standard and custom Toolset configurations.


When you create a project in Visual Studio, or upgrade an existing project, an attribute named ToolsVersion is automatically included in the project file and its value corresponds to the version of MSBuild that is included in the Visual Studio edition. For more information, see Framework targeting overview.


When a ToolsVersion value is defined in a project file, MSBuild uses that value to determine the values of the Toolset properties that are available to the project. One Toolset property is $(MSBuildToolsPath), which specifies the path of the .NET Framework tools. Only that Toolset property (or $(MSBuildBinPath)), is required.


Starting in Visual Studio 2013, the MSBuild Toolset version is the same as the Visual Studio version number. MSBuild defaults to this Toolset within Visual Studio and on the command line, regardless of the Toolset version specified in the project file. This behavior can be overridden by using the -ToolsVersion flag. For more information, see Override ToolsVersion settings.


When you build a solution on the command line and specify a ToolsVersion for msbuild.exe, all projects and their project-to-project dependencies are built according to that ToolsVersion, even if each project in the solution specifies its own ToolsVersion. To define the ToolsVersion value on a per project basis, see Overriding ToolsVersion settings.


The ToolsVersion attribute is also used for project migration. For example, if you open a Visual Studio 2008 project in Visual Studio 2010, the project file is updated to include ToolsVersion="4.0". If you then try to open that project in Visual Studio 2008, it doesn't recognize the upgraded ToolsVersion and therefore builds the project as though the attribute was still set to 3.5.


Visual Studio 2010 and Visual Studio 2012 use a ToolsVersion of 4.0. Visual Studio 2013 uses a ToolsVersion of 12.0. Visual Studio 2015 uses ToolsVersion 14.0, and Visual Studio 2017 uses ToolsVersion 15.0. In many cases, you can open the project in multiple versions of Visual Studio without modification. Visual Studio always uses the correct Toolset, but you will be notified if the version used does not match the version in the project file. In almost all cases, this warning is benign as the Toolsets are compatible in most cases.


Sub-toolsets, which are described later in this topic, allow MSBuild to automatically switch which set of tools to use based on the context in which the build is being run. For example, MSBuild uses a newer set of tools when it's run in Visual Studio 2012 than when it's run in Visual Studio 2010, without your having to explicitly change the project file.


Toolset properties specify the paths of the tools. Starting in Visual Studio 2017, MSBuild no longer has a fixed location. By default, it is located in the MSBuild\15.0\Bin folder relative to the Visual Studio installation location. In earlier versions, MSBuild uses the value of the ToolsVersion attribute in the project file to locate the corresponding registry key, and then uses the information in the registry key to set the Toolset properties. For example, if ToolsVersion has the value 12.0, then MSBuild sets the Toolset properties according to this registry key: HKLM\Software\Microsoft\MSBuild\ToolsVersions\12.0.


I have had the same exact issues with my attempted upgrade to VS 2019. However, what I have read is that the MSBuild version is supposed to correspond to the Visual Studio version. Hence, VS2017=MSBuild 15.x, VS2019=MSBuild 16.x.


So far, I have had to return to my version of VS2015, which runs all my projects as expected. Not sure what to do since I couldn't get any help from Microsoft technical support without paying $500.00.


In my system I have VS 2017, 2019 and 2022 installed along with .Net Core 6. Not sure what suddenly caused build failures in one of the solution developed in VS 2017 and all the projects were not loading in any of VS. The erro was something related to MS build path.


This is the source of the error, Package.swift is not supposed to contain the source code for your package. Package.swift is a package manifest that specifies what dependencies, products, and targets your package declares.


Move your print("hello") code to a file with any other name and then you can compile it as a standalone source file with swiftc, or with swift build as a part of a package that has a valid Package.swift manifest.


kernel32.lib is provided by the Windows SDK, it sounds like you didn't install Visual Studio properly (this is already covered in the installation instructions) or you have multiple versions installed, in which case you need to use the Developer Command prompt for the Visual Studio version that you want to use.


The missing "hello" line from your output indicates that SwiftPM didn't read your print("hello"). Since standard library functions are allowed in the manifest, if the call is read, then "hello" should be in your output.


The first error message says that SwiftPM can't find your tools version specification, even though we can see it's there and well-formed. The specification parser's logic shouldn't be affected by the platform it runs on, and there are some really really extensive test cases just for parsing this line of comment, so I'm very confident that the error is not from the parser. (A bit of an aside: this makes me realise we probably should add some diagnostics for invisible characters, so we can point them out in the error message if they exist.)


Also note: you will still have an "invalid manifest" error after this problem is resolved, because you don't have a Package instance named package in the manifest. We should improve the message here a bit to point out exactly what's causing the error (whether SwiftPM thinks it's empty or package is missing etc).


I reverted the upgrade, even uninstalled Swift and VS completely and did everything as it is written in the installing swift manual. No success. No matter what I do, no matter if I go by manual or install the components and swift myself, it does not work anymore.


given that swift 5.10 has not been released yet, i found it odd that this package no longer supports any extant versions of swift. what was the rationale behind dropping support for 5.9?


That's an excellent question. swift-testing is an experimental package that relies on language and toolchain features that aren't available in Swift 5.9. The changes that we've made to Swift Package Manager to experimentally support swift-testing are not available in Swift 5.10 or earlier.


We use semantic versioning with our releases. Releases prior to 1.0 should be considered "unstable" with all aspects subject to change. In the case of swift-testing, this includes the minimum Swift version needed to use it.


We continue to include basic support for Swift 5.10 at this time because we recognize that not all developers are able to switch to Swift's unstable main branch just to use swift-testing. There are features in Swift 5.11 such as SwiftPM's GitInformation structure and the proposed low-level linkage control that we are adopting or looking to adopt. Because we'll be relying on these features, a minimum Swift version of 5.11 will be necessary in the near future.


We're aware SPI (and Swiftinit!) isn't able to produce documentation for swift-testing 0.4.0 right now. We view this as a temporary issue: the Swift project has branched for 5.10 and once the 5.10 toolchain is officially released, it's fair to expect Swift Package Index to start supporting it in short order.


I am getting this message when trying to apply ssp 2023.10.01 to SY-480-Gen10 servers: "Firmware and drivers update using Smart Update Tools cannot be done

with the selected ServicePack and the Smart Update Tools version detected on the server. Resolution Install Smart Update Tools version 2.4.0.0 or newer and

retry the firmware update by selecting a ServicePack that contains a Smart Update Manager (SUM) version of 8.4.0 or newer."


This is the same procedure that I've followed for years: edit the template w/ new spp and update profile from the template.

To troubleshoot I changed the server baseline ssp to 2023.01 and it completed with no errors. This updated SUT to version 4.0.0.0.

Tried ssp 2023.10 again and got the same failure.

Repeated the process with ssp 2023.05 then 2023.08. Each worked successfully and ended up with SUT version 4.2.0.0.

Tried 2023.10 again with but still no luck.

Upgraded only SUT to 4.6.0.1 but still fails applying ssp 2023.10.

I have another identical setup at another data center and got the same results there.


Plan A : Please try to install the latest SPP at first, if any issue persists, install SPP without SUT so that it can update the system except SUT.

After that you can update it to latest SUT version.

Plan B: Update the SUT first, after that you can update the system excluding the SUT.

If you are unable to execute plan A or B, please reply with the issue or error if any.


Can you confirm when this newer SSP was uploaded to Oneview? There is a known problem if it was added to OV prior to it being upgraded to 6.60.04 or later, then it may fail. The problem in the advisory is usually seen when performing offline updates, since that is more common, but it can show up while using SUT also. When using SUT this can manifest as a comunication problem between SUM in Oneview being able to talk with SUT running in the host OS.

3a8082e126
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages