Hum 100 5-1 Discussion

[Kevin]

NoteDiscussions can be graded or ungraded. If a student attaches a file to an ungraded discussion, the file size counts toward the student's storage quotas. However, attachments added to graded discussions do not count toward the student's storage quotas.

Note: When a document is uploaded to the Rich Content Editor from a discussion, the file is saved to the Uploaded Media folder in Course Files and defaults to hidden status. Students can view the file when the discussion is made available to them. Learn more about file visibility.

In the Usage Right drop-down menu [2], select one of five usage rights. If you are an instructor and are not sure which usage right applies to your file, please consult your institutional admin for guidance:

To create a graded assignment, click the Graded checkbox [3]. When creating a graded assignment, additional options display, where you can select a number of points, add peer reviews, and select other options. Learn more about creating a graded assignment for everyone, individual students, course sections, or course groups.

To add an ungraded discussion to the student to-do list, click the Add to student to-do checkbox [5]. Student to-do items display in the course calendar, in the student-specific List View Dashboard, and in the global and course home page to-do lists. Graded discussions automatically display in a student's to-do list.

To change the assignees, click the Assign To field [1]. Then, select one or more assignees. You can assign to everyone, everyone else, a course section [2], or an individual student [3].

By default, students can access the discussion at any time during the course or section dates. However, to provide specific dates and times for the discussion to be available, enter dates and/or times in the Available from [1] and Until areas [2].

Engaging discussions are one of the most rewarding and memorable activities that students and faculty alike can experience in the classroom. Recent research shows that classroom discussion deepens learning, creates community, and helps students form an academic identity.

At the same time, classroom discussion is a challenging pedagogical undertaking. It requires the instructor to orchestrate learning among a group of students who likely do not know each other, come from a diversity of backgrounds, possess a range of political commitments, arrive with varying levels of familiarity with the course material, and have different levels of comfort speaking in class.

Note: if you are visiting this page and are at an institution other that UW-Madison and would like The Discussion Project to come to your campus, please go to our nonprofit website thediscuss...@wceps.org

This might be a hot take, and by no means do i mean with this that this Game needs Immersion updates more than it needs actual bug fixes or reworks, but imo its one of those things that are overlooked for far too long by now.

The Warhammer Universe has way too much amazing and iconic Heraldry that it is almost borderline criminal not to have Banner Bearers, who have also played a Role in the TT, who hold up their Banners with all the unique Heraldry on it. Also Officers & Musicians, though neither of them would have as much of an impact as Banner Bearers imo.

While we fight in the insanely diverse and unique world of the Warhammer Universe, the vast majority of Battle Maps feels super vanilla and uninspired. I am fully aware that it is a major undertaking to make more immersive and unique Battle Maps, but given how much focus is on actual Battles in this game it would be a nice change to see Villages on the maps, corn fields, big forestry areas and positions that just HEAVILY favor one side.

Sadly with the current Battlemaps that hardly ever a thing. 9 out of 10 times one gets excited if there is a big rock in the middle of the map that makes it unpassable terrain because that is considered unique.

The Warhammer Universe is usually known for its Grim Dark & Gritty Style, right now the game is way too bright and nice looking. There needs severe tweaks to lighting to give it back the style of what Total War Warhammer 1 had.

Compare the Animations of a Cathay Caster Hero to those of the Empire. Where the Cathay Caster uses cool looking magic attacks that reflect them being a caster, the Empire Wizards just swing their sword as if they lost all will to live ages ago. Not the biggest Deal, but still something i personally would love to see being changed.

I am saying this because i personally think, while apart from Battle Maps, those things would not give new Gameplay experiences, it would drastically enhance the Feeling of the Gameplay. Immersion is something that has a big impact on how one feels while playing the game, and should not be overlooked.

Hi there! So I'll start off by saying that I can't give you a direct answer on a lot of these, as we have a lot of different factors to balance when creating/improving WH3. Appreciate that you'll want a 'yes' or a 'no', but please know that we read and take note of all feedback posted here (and on other channels) so that we can keep discussing it with devs. I also can't promise anything - I don't want to create expectations that we may not be able to fulfill; this wouldn't be fair :)

Banner Bearers - Officers - Musicians: I have raised this to devs. This has come up a few times, particularly on the Forums. I will keep a note on this as we move towards planning and working on our next releases.

Lighting - I haven't seen too much feedback about this, and it is likely that the lighting has been adjusted for accessibility/visibility reasons. If you have some specific examples I'd be happy to take a look.

Hi there, appreciate that sometimes people have long-running campaigns. As a player above mentioned, we have rollback builds available - this allows you to continue your campaign on a previous build, unaffected by the most recent changes. -assembly.com/total-war/total-war-warhammer/forums/8-general-discussion/threads/1697-how-to-roll-back-to-a-previous-build-of-total-war-warhammer-iii Best, CA_Nova

Hey there, I spoke to a designer about this, it is indeed by design: there isn't any considerable benefit to staying undivided other than the greater variety in mount options so we made that a design choice, become stronger but reduce mount variety or stay undivided and keep your mounts without the advantage of the chaos god flavour boons. Best, CA_Nova

This discussion paper considers regulatory and supervisory issues relating to outsourcing and third-party relationships. It will facilitate a discussion on current regulatory and supervisory approaches to the management of outsourcing and third-party risks.

There is a common concern about the possibility of systemic risk arising from concentration in the provision of some outsourced and third-party services to financial institutions. These risks may become higher as the number of financial institutions receiving critical services from a given third party increases. Where there is no appropriate mitigant in place, a major disruption, outage or failure at one of these third parties could create a single point of failure with potential adverse consequences for financial stability and/or the safety and soundness of multiple financial institutions. Given the cross-border nature of this dependency, supervisory authorities and third parties could particularly benefit from enhanced dialogue on this issue.

The Settings Discussion Screen allows you to set the options concerning comments (also called discussion). It is here the administrator decides if comments are allowed, if pingbacks and trackbacks are acceptable, and what constitutes Comment Spam. On this Screen you also control the circumstances under which your blog sends you e-mail notification of certain events at your site.

Click the Save Changes button to ensure any changes you have made to your Settings are saved to your database. Once you click the button, a confirmation text box will appear at the top of the page telling you your settings have been saved.

The site is secure.

The ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

The discussion paper provides background information on 3D printing and proposes potential PoC manufacturing scenarios for public comment. The discussion paper does not constitute guidance; instead, its purpose is to gather feedback from the public to inform future policy development.

The FDA seeks further input from the medical device industry, manufacturers, health care providers, health care facilities, and other stakeholders to address these topics and questions to further explore appropriate regulatory approaches for PoC 3D printing of medical devices.

The following letters are written by staff in the Office of Legal Counsel. They do not constitute official opinions of the Commission. This collection contains both informal discussion letters that respond to inquiries from members of the public and letters that respond to other federal agencies' and departments' requests for public comment. This collection will be updated monthly.

Online discussions provide unique benefits. Because students can take time to ponder before they post ideas, you may see more thoughtful conversations. You can observe as students demonstrate their grasp of the material and correct misconceptions. You can extend your office hours and reach students more often during the week so that learning is continuous.

A sense of community among students is crucial for a successful online experience. With online discussions, course members can replicate the robust discussions that take place in the traditional classroom.

The Internet's Finest Tropical Fruit Discussion Forum!

"All discussion content within the forum reflects the views of the individual participants and does not necessarily represent the views held by the Tropical Fruit Forum as an organization."

3a8082e126