Share Face

[Bazara Benavides]

Ifyou receive a watch face with a complication from a third-party app, tap the price of the app or Get to download the app from the App Store. You can also tap Continue Without This App to get the watch face without the third-party complication.

Tip: You can use partner sharing with one person at a time. To partner share with someone else, or receive an invitation from a different person, stop sharing with your current partner.

Hi @Samuelxm, you cannot share a private Space. In order to share a link, it needs to be public. Another solution is to move your Space to an Organization, invite the viewers to the hub, and add them to the Organization. Thus, they will be able to see your private Space.

Hi,

I downloaded Affinity Designer about a week ago from a recommendation of a friend.

I am new to this whole computer design and illustration and trying to teach myself techniques and skills.

I have completed a couple of different projects I set for myself but here is my first ever attempt at a persons face (Snoop Dogg as requested by my brother).

Any comments would be much appreciated :)

That would be a really nice job in any case but for someone one new to the format, that's very impressive! And Welcome to the forum. Lots of friendly, knowledgable, and helpful people here if you run into a problem along the way.

Book value is the net value of a company's assets as recorded on its balance sheet. It's calculated by subtracting a company's total liabilities from its total assets. Essentially, book value reflects the amount that would be left over for shareholders if a company were to liquidate all its assets and pay off all its debts. This measure provides insight into a company's intrinsic value and is often used by investors to gauge whether a stock is overvalued or undervalued.

The public sees widespread discrimination against several racial, ethnic and religious groups in the U.S. And while most of these views are little changed over the last several years, the share of Americans saying Jews face discrimination in the U.S. has increased substantially since late 2016.

Majorities in both partisan groups say there is at least some discrimination against many groups, including Muslims, blacks, gays and lesbians, and Hispanics. But the share of Democrats who say each of these groups face discrimination is significantly higher than the share of Republicans who say the same. For instance, 92% of Democrats, compared with 69% of Republicans, say Muslims face at least some discrimination.

Since 2013, when a similarly-worded question asked about discrimination against African Americans, the change is even more striking. Six years ago, just 28% of Democrats said African Americans faced a lot of discrimination; today, more than twice as many Democrats say blacks face a lot of discrimination. (Over this period, an increasing share of Democrats also say that racial discrimination is the main reason some blacks cannot get ahead.)

There also is a wider partisan divide in views of whether evangelical Christians face a lot of discrimination. Currently, just 8% of Democrats say this, little changed from December 2016. By comparison, 30% of Republicans hold this view, up from 21% in 2016.

The partisan gap in views about discrimination against whites is little changed from 2016; Republicans remain more likely than Democrats to say there is a lot of discrimination against whites (21% vs. 6%).

Overall, whites are less likely than blacks to say that blacks face at least some discrimination (77% vs. 91%). Among whites, there is a wide partisan gap in views of discrimination against blacks (91% of white Democrats and Democratic leaners say there is at least some discrimination against blacks in our society, compared with 66% of white Republicans).

A similar pattern is seen for Hispanics. Whites overall are less likely to say that Hispanics face discrimination (73% of whites say this, compared with 86% of Hispanics). However, 90% of white Democrats say that Hispanics face at least some discrimination compared with 59% of white Republicans.

When asked about discrimination against whites, whites are more likely than blacks or Hispanics to say that there is at least some discrimination against whites in the U.S. (44% of whites say this compared to 29% of blacks and 33% of Hispanics). Yet while 60% of white Republicans say society discriminates against whites, only 24% of white Democrats share this view.

While majorities of both men and women say there is at least some discrimination against women, this view is more widely held among women (76%) than it is among men (62%). Both men and women are substantially less likely to see discrimination against men. Men are slightly more likely than women to say there is a lot or some discrimination against men (43% of men, 36% of women).

Within partisan groups there are no gender gaps in views about discrimination against men: About half of Republican men (51%) and a similar share of GOP women (44%) say that there is at least some discrimination against men. Both Democratic men (29%) and Democratic women (26%) are much less likely say this.

The 118th Congress achieved a variety of demographic milestones when its members took office in January. Generation Z is now represented in the national legislature, while Vermont sent a female lawmaker to Capitol Hill for the first time. Still, Congress remains out of step with the broader U.S. population by several demographic measures.

This Pew Research Center analysis examines the changing demographic profile of Congress over time. It is based on previously published studies by the Center. For information about the sourcing and methodology of these studies, follow the links in the text of this analysis.

Nearly all findings in this analysis are based on voting members of Congress and exclude nonvoting members. The analysis of women in Congress, however, is based on nonvoting as well as voting members.

Despite this growing racial and ethnic diversity, Congress remains less diverse than the nation as a whole. Non-Hispanic White Americans account for 75% of voting members in the new Congress, considerably more than their 59% share of the U.S. population.

The House has seen slow but steady growth in the number of women members since the 1920s, when women gained the right to vote. Growth in the Senate has been slower. The Senate did not have more than three women serving at any point until the 102nd Congress, which began in 1991.

These lawmakers account for 3% of voting members, slightly higher than the share in other recent Congresses, but below the shares in much earlier Congresses. In the 50th Congress of 1887-89, for example, 8% of members were born abroad. The current share of foreign-born lawmakers in Congress is also far below the foreign-born share of the entire U.S. population, which was 13.6% as of 2021.

While the number of foreign-born lawmakers in the current Congress is small, more members have at least one parent who was born in another country. Together, immigrants and children of immigrants account for at least 15% of the new Congress, a slightly higher share than in the last Congress (14%).

Since the second half of the 20th century, there has been a dramatic decrease in members of Congress with military experience. Between 1965 and 1975, at least 70% of lawmakers in each legislative chamber had military experience. The share of members with military experience peaked at 75% in 1967 for the House and at 81% in 1975 for the Senate.

This webinar featured museum technician Amanda Lawrence and paleoanthropologist Briana Pobiner. They shared what it is like to be a woman in science and discussed the people and experiences that have had a significant impact on their journeys, the skills that helped them be successful, and the challenges they have overcome.

I am running deepstack in a docker on Proxmox and HA in a VM. Deepstack works fine when running manual (using curl and returning the faces), but I am getting a 403 error when calling the image.processing.image command. See below the deepstack log, with the first the manual command and the second the call service command.

I installed HA in docker on machine 1 and got deepstack with deepstackui working on machine 2.

I also installed hacs component for deepstack_object with below configuration.yaml:

image_processing:

I have made amendments to the integration. Now we not only determine the name, but also checks the confidence. Without confidence, it often determines incorrectly. For example, the camera recognized the face of user 1 and the confidence of the recognized face is not indicated, then deepstack can report that it is user 2, and this is already an error. Therefore, I added the condition if the username and confidence are above 70, then this is true, if if the username and confidence are below 70, then this is false.

I need your help. Thanks to one person who gave me an amazing option and who encouraged me to redo everything. This option is good because I will not need to go into the code of the deep stack_force integration itself, but I can do it using the Home Assistant.

The issue is resolved. He was lying right on the surface. A wonderful deepstack client from tomer/deepstack-trainer. Russian Russian names I was able to specify there and the recognized names in Russian began to be displayed in the sensor

In 2022, conflict-related fatalities in these countries increased by over 40 percent. The deterioration of the security situation over the past decade has caused a humanitarian crisis, with more than 3 million people fleeing violence in Burkina Faso, Mali, and Niger, according to UNHCR.

Abebe Selassie: Governments in these countries (except for Mauritania) are facing tighter financing constraints, exacerbated by escalating security costs and rising debt. Security spending has imposed an increasing and unavoidable burden on budgets, reaching 3.9 percent of GDP in 2022 and absorbing 25 percent of fiscal revenues before grants, on average. Increased security spending is a necessity to ensure stability, but it is crowding out other priority spending, including the provision of basic public services.

3a8082e126