Suing Government Operatives for Income Tax Abuse
Possible Non-Rebellion Path to Justice
Let us examine some facts regarding income tax in America. The U.S. Constitution requires Congress to apportion direct taxes among the states according to percentage of the population. Congress created confusing tax laws that make it seem as though everyone who earns money must pay a tax on profit, and their own labor has no value in that profit calculation.
People who “smell a rat” in this concept and study it in depth discover the reality that people generally do not owe an income tax. They find out that government operatives abusively demand it, collect it, and condemn everyone who refuses to pay it because they don’t owe it. Those who organize, lead, and the resistance to unconstitutional and unlawfully implemented income tax comprise a “tax honesty movement.”
Government operatives have aggressively attacked people in the “movement,” contriving to get them incarcerated for writing and selling books about the movement and how to participate in it by refusing to pay any unowed tax. The Internal Revenue Service and U.S. Department of Justice (DOJ), at the continued behest of the President of the United States, have established a culture of persecution of people in the movement. Government operatives, including judges, refer to them variously as Tax Defiers, Tax Protestors, Tax Cheats, etc. Government operatives have thus besmirched the image of the tax honesty movement and its adherents in the minds of the sheep-like people of America who blindly believe “everybody ought to pay income tax on their earnings.” Government operatives don’t do this merely to win in disputes against tax honesty advocates, but to defame and destroy them in the mind of the public.
This must stop.
An attorney friend wrote me about this yesterday
“We, meaning several of the attorneys in the movement, are looking very hard at several ways to mount a counter-offensive against the DOJ sponsored assault on the movement. That is, however, not as simple a matter as it appears. If the defamatory component in their assault were as cut and dried as in [an anti-tax-honesty attorney’s] case, then that would definitely be in the works, but it's a glancing blow, open for argument.
“We are also, however, planning on issuing a challenge to this bunch to put up or shut up. More on that once we get the wrinkles ironed out. We're already shopping for a sponsor to promote and conduct the showdown.”
I fully endorse such a plan of action. After all, even a glancing blow can give people the heart to mount a more aggressive and effective attack against the abuse. To that end, I supplied my friend with a list of facts in support of the cause of action. I present it to you for review and encourage you to add any items you think I have missed. Send them to me and I shall forward them to my friend. Once you examine the list below, you will see why my friend might prefer a little anonymity.
1. The IRS creates frivolous argument penalties out of thin air. Congress has the exclusive power to decide whether an argument is frivolous, but only within the constraints of the First Amendment.
2. The whole official tax world seems to believe USDC and USCCA judges are gods who never err, but you can prove non-unanimous panel court rulings show that even judges don’t know what the law means, and sticking people with a majority ruling still does not solve the problem that the law MIGHT mean what the dissenters say it means, This proves that the legislature has let the people down by creating laws even judges don’t understand and therefore the common people have no obligation to try to decipher and obey them.
3. Court rulings get overturned all the time, and shenanigans by the DOJ and judges prevent most people from appealing bad decisions because they simply run out of money. This appears to constitute part of the DOJ strategy for beating down people who don’t agree with the implementation of the income tax or interpretation of the confusing tax laws. If a ruling gets overturned, that means people cannot trust the judgment of judges.
4. The DOJ could not possibly win so many criminal Income Tax cases unless it suborned the jury and/or judge.
5. The secret cash awards amount to bribes to create more prosecution of tax protestors, and to do any illegal make the victim of IRS abuse lose the court case.
6. DOJ prosecutes instead of showing people the law. That amounts to criminal racketeering and SLAPP violation, and a refusal to respond meaningfully to a petition for redress of grievance.
7. A judge’s ruling demonstrates opinion, not fact, particularly when the judge flat prevents juries from learning that they can judge the law, and the judge tells them what the law means, and the judge and DOJ prevent their victims from entering evidence.
8. The USDC judges NEVER require the prosecutor to submit evidence that proves the 7 elements of jurisdiction in tax crime cases.
9. Judges, DOJ attorneys, and IRS agents are all prejudiced because they are taxpayers who must “return” a kickback to government for the privilege of performing a government job. This prejudices them, and prevents the people from getting fair trials before them. The jurors have similar prejudice and NEVER have non-taxpayers as half the members.
10. No duly authorized assessment officer EVER signs a statement under penalties of perjury that the assessment reflects an accurate amount of tax owed, due, and payable by the named taxpayer.
11. NO COURT seems to have the authority to declare that any given person does not have “taxpayer” status. That violates Amendment 1 (petition for redress).
12. Judges’ threatened and real sanctions and disciplinary actions against attorneys prevent the people from IRS victims from having available or obtaining an aggressive, vigorous, OR COMPETENT defense.
13. The American Condition guarantees the eventuation of evil and iniquitous judges through
a. Unconstitutional judicial immunity from prosecution for crimes and torts in both ministerial and judicial functions,
b. historical meaninglessness of “good behavior” controls,
c. lack of any law that punishes violations of the loyalty oath or Code of Judicial Conduct,
d. virtual impossibility of honest and prompt impeachment proceedings,
e. actual impossibility of empaneling juries of knowledge and integrity,
f. impossibility of a citizen’s submitting evidence of judicial crimes to grand juries without DOJ interference,
g. Integration of the bar into and regulation of the practice of law by State Supreme Courts, along with the farming of state judges to populate the federal judiciary.
As you well know, the people can achieve liberty from abusive government only through
1. litigation that obtains judicial punishment of the abusers,
2. political action that installs good elected officials who eliminate bad laws, and
3. separation from the iniquitous abusers, such as through armed and violent rebellion.
As shown in the above lists, America now provides apparently hopelessly
1. hamstrung grand juries,
2. corrupt judges who enjoy immunity they should not have,
3. legislators who make unconstitutional laws even the judges cannot understand, and
4. iron-willed executive officers who exceed authority and abuse the people at will.
In addition, America suffers from an irresponsible and relatively stupid electorate because of
1. massive immigration and unchecked procreation of low-IQ people, and
2. giving every irresponsible, indigent, ward-of-the-state non-felon citizen over 18 the power to vote.
In other words, the courts and political process no longer provide Americans with remedy. Abuse by government operatives has skyrocketed as a consequence. That leaves only one option with any hope of working - separation from the abusers, as exemplified by the nation’s founders in the Declaration of Independence, the text of which I provide below as a reminder of YOUR OBLIGATION to America.
On the other hand, I hope our attorney friends will demonstrate the ability to take effective legal action against the perps in Government. And I shall support their efforts because
1. I consider it the right thing to do, and
2. Violent rebellion is SUCH a pain in the ass.
Will you join me in this?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Bob Hurt
2460 Persian Drive #70
Clearwater, FL 33763
+1 (727) 669-5511
Donate to my Law Scholarship fund
Learn civil litigation with Jurisdictionary
Subscribe to Lawmen
Newsletter FREE
Download Files FREE
from the Lawmen Archive
Improve your financial fortunes with GetZooks!
Save
Fuel
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Standing up against crimes and brutality of Government operatives exacts a mean cost. Judge from this rendering of the fate of the signatories of the Declaration of Independence. http://www.usff.com/usff/sacredhonor.html
“Of those 56 who signed the Declaration of Independence, nine died of wounds or hardships during the war. Five were captured and imprisoned, in each case with brutal treatment. Several lost wives, sons or entire families. One lost his 13 children. Two wives were brutally treated. All were at one time or another the victims of manhunts and driven from their homes. Twelve signers had their homes completely burned. Seventeen lost everything they owned. Yet not one defected or went back on his pledged word. Their honor, and the nation they sacrificed so much to create, is still intact.
“And, finally, there is the New Jersey signer, Abraham Clark. He gave two sons to the officer corps in the Revolutionary Army. They were captured and sent to the infamous British prison hulk afloat in New York harbor known as the hell ship "Jersey," where 11,000 American captives were to die. The younger Clarks were treated with a special brutality because of their father. One was put in solitary and given no food. With the end almost in sight, with the war almost won, no one could have blamed Abraham Clark for acceding to the British request when they offered him his sons' lives if he would recant and come out for the King and parliament. The utter despair in this man's heart, the anguish in his very soul, must reach out to each one of us down through 200 years with his answer: "No."
“The 56 signers of the Declaration of Independence proved by their every deed that they made no idle boast when they composed the most magnificent curtain line in history. "And for the support of this Declaration with a firm reliance on the protection of divine providence, we mutually pledge to each other our lives, our fortunes and our sacred honor."
|
IN CONGRESS, JULY 4, 1776 The unanimous Declaration of the thirteen united States of America
We hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal, that they are endowed by their Creator with certain unalienable Rights, that among these are Life, Liberty and the pursuit of Happiness. — That to secure these rights, Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just powers from the consent of the governed, — That whenever any Form of Government becomes destructive of these ends, it is the Right of the People to alter or to abolish it, and to institute new Government, laying its foundation on such principles and organizing its powers in such form, as to them shall seem most likely to effect their Safety and Happiness. Prudence, indeed, will dictate that Governments long established should not be changed for light and transient causes; and accordingly all experience hath shewn that mankind are more disposed to suffer, while evils are sufferable than to right themselves by abolishing the forms to which they are accustomed. But when a long train of abuses and usurpations, pursuing invariably the same Object evinces a design to reduce them under absolute Despotism, it is their right, it is their duty, to throw off such Government, and to provide new Guards for their future security. — Such has been the patient sufferance of these Colonies; and such is now the necessity which constrains them to alter their former Systems of Government. The history of the present King of Great Britain is a history of repeated injuries and usurpations, all having in direct object the establishment of an absolute Tyranny over these States. To prove this, let Facts be submitted to a candid world. He has refused his Assent to Laws, the most wholesome and necessary for the public good. He has forbidden his Governors to pass Laws of immediate and pressing importance, unless suspended in their operation till his Assent should be obtained; and when so suspended, he has utterly neglected to attend to them. He has refused to pass other Laws for the accommodation of large districts of people, unless those people would relinquish the right of Representation in the Legislature, a right inestimable to them and formidable to tyrants only. He has called together legislative bodies at places unusual, uncomfortable, and distant from the depository of their Public Records, for the sole purpose of fatiguing them into compliance with his measures. He has dissolved Representative Houses repeatedly, for opposing with manly firmness his invasions on the rights of the people. He has refused for a long time, after such dissolutions, to cause others to be elected, whereby the Legislative Powers, incapable of Annihilation, have returned to the People at large for their exercise; the State remaining in the mean time exposed to all the dangers of invasion from without, and convulsions within. He has endeavoured to prevent the population of these States; for that purpose obstructing the Laws for Naturalization of Foreigners; refusing to pass others to encourage their migrations hither, and raising the conditions of new Appropriations of Lands. He has obstructed the Administration of Justice by refusing his Assent to Laws for establishing Judiciary Powers. He has made Judges dependent on his Will alone for the tenure of their offices, and the amount and payment of their salaries. He has erected a multitude of New Offices, and sent hither swarms of Officers to harass our people and eat out their substance. He has kept among us, in times of peace, Standing Armies without the Consent of our legislatures. He has affected to render the Military independent of and superior to the Civil Power. He has combined with others to subject us to a jurisdiction foreign to our constitution, and unacknowledged by our laws; giving his Assent to their Acts of pretended Legislation: For quartering large bodies of armed troops among us: For protecting them, by a mock Trial from punishment for any Murders which they should commit on the Inhabitants of these States: For cutting off our Trade with all parts of the world: For imposing Taxes on us without our Consent: For depriving us in many cases, of the benefit of Trial by Jury: For transporting us beyond Seas to be tried for pretended offences: For abolishing the free System of English Laws in a neighbouring Province, establishing therein an Arbitrary government, and enlarging its Boundaries so as to render it at once an example and fit instrument for introducing the same absolute rule into these Colonies For taking away our Charters, abolishing our most valuable Laws and altering fundamentally the Forms of our Governments: For suspending our own Legislatures, and declaring themselves invested with power to legislate for us in all cases whatsoever. He has abdicated Government here, by declaring us out of his Protection and waging War against us. He has plundered our seas, ravaged our coasts, burnt our towns, and destroyed the lives of our people. He is at this time transporting large Armies of foreign Mercenaries to compleat the works of death, desolation, and tyranny, already begun with circumstances of Cruelty & Perfidy scarcely paralleled in the most barbarous ages, and totally unworthy the Head of a civilized nation. He has constrained our fellow Citizens taken Captive on the high Seas to bear Arms against their Country, to become the executioners of their friends and Brethren, or to fall themselves by their Hands. He has excited domestic insurrections amongst us, and has endeavoured to bring on the inhabitants of our frontiers, the merciless Indian Savages whose known rule of warfare, is an undistinguished destruction of all ages, sexes and conditions. In every stage of these Oppressions We have Petitioned for Redress in the most humble terms: Our repeated Petitions have been answered only by repeated injury. A Prince, whose character is thus marked by every act which may define a Tyrant, is unfit to be the ruler of a free people. Nor have We been wanting in attentions to our British brethren. We have warned them from time to time of attempts by their legislature to extend an unwarrantable jurisdiction over us. We have reminded them of the circumstances of our emigration and settlement here. We have appealed to their native justice and magnanimity, and we have conjured them by the ties of our common kindred to disavow these usurpations, which would inevitably interrupt our connections and correspondence. They too have been deaf to the voice of justice and of consanguinity. We must, therefore, acquiesce in the necessity, which denounces our Separation, and hold them, as we hold the rest of mankind, Enemies in War, in Peace Friends. We, therefore, the Representatives of the united States of America, in General Congress, Assembled, appealing to the Supreme Judge of the world for the rectitude of our intentions, do, in the Name, and by Authority of the good People of these Colonies, solemnly publish and declare, That these united Colonies are, and of Right ought to be Free and Independent States, that they are Absolved from all Allegiance to the British Crown, and that all political connection between them and the State of Great Britain, is and ought to be totally dissolved; and that as Free and Independent States, they have full Power to levy War, conclude Peace, contract Alliances, establish Commerce, and to do all other Acts and Things which Independent States may of right do. — And for the support of this Declaration, with a firm reliance on the protection of Divine Providence, we mutually pledge to each other our Lives, our Fortunes, and our sacred Honor. New Hampshire: Massachusetts: Rhode Island: Connecticut: New York: New Jersey: Pennsylvania: Delaware: Maryland: Virginia: North Carolina: South Carolina: Georgia: |