Marcel
offered this idea:
Judge
just says “You’re in contempt of court.”
- “Do/will
you charge me with civil or criminal contempt?”
Since I have no linkage to the court, such as a contractual relationship
like bar membership or a judgment (probation or parole), the judge cannot
answer criminal. If he says criminal, I demand the contract between me
and the court. Normally, judge will answer civil.
- “Do/will
you charge me with direct or indirect contempt?”
Judge now knows I have him and I won’t let go, because he can only
answer “indirect.” Now, I spit the following at him like a
machine gun, fast. I don’t want his answer. I just want this on
the record.
- “Since
you are a party to this action, who will adjudicate this instant
action?”
- “At
adjudication, I demand my right to a trial by jury for this action.”
- “Please
instruct the bailiff to obtain the name, address, and telephone numbers of
everyone in this room that I may call these witnesses in my defense
against your treasonous activities, including violation of your oath, in
this room today.”
- “I have
constitutionally secured liberties which I do not relinquish now or at any
other time.”
- “You
have constitutional limitations from which I do not release you now or at
any other time.”
- “Unless
you can in law show nature and cause as well as proper jurisdiction, then
I shall hold you personally responsible and liable for any harm that comes
to me as a direct or indirect consequence of your actions. Furthermore, I
take exception to your command and I reserve my rights.”
- “I have
now warned and given you notice.” Pause to let
the gravity of his situation sink into his mind. “Now what about that contempt
charge?”
M.
Roy Benshadler, KC7...@yahoo.com,
503-753-5753.
Truly, sincerely, and without prejudice
(UCC 1-308),