lavaan

No, to be honest I did not double check the factor loadings, but now that you mention it... :D Thanks

Thanks for your response. I was able to resolve the issue by setting the constraint as b4^2 = 4*b3*b5

right? Sounds right. Terrence D. Jorgensen Assistant Professor, Methods and Statistics Research

I am new to lavaan after AMOS and I was wondering how I can fix the correlation between two latent

Dear Patrick, I think what AhabsFriend was pointing out is that labels are group-specific. So you

You can mention a variable twice--the parser figures this out. So you can write: F1 =~ NA*V1 + a*V1 +

Dear Dr. Rigdon, Thank you very much for your reply. It is very helpful and solved my problem! On

The reason I am not sure if these models are correct: did I correctly change the constraints to scale

I want the indirect effects for all groups to be run Then just define the indirect effect for each

Hi Edward, That does make sense! And yes, you are correct without treating the variables as ordinal

Do you think that would be possible? Not with the way the software is designed. Terrence D. Jorgensen

Thanks Terrence, it worked. Best Felix

Hi Terrence, Are you trying to implement something like Grimm & Ram (2009)? http://dx.doi.org/10.