SRMR difference in Mplus vs lavaan

29 views
Skip to first unread message

Dai Duong

unread,
Nov 27, 2019, 3:41:09 PM11/27/19
to lavaan

Hi everyone,

I run my model on Mplus and lavaan. Results are 99.99% similar except SRMR in Mplus is .063 while in lavaan is .045

I don’t know why they are different while other indices are identical.

 

In lavaan, fitMeasures() even produces srmr_mplus (.281) and srmr_mplus_nomean (.045). Both are very much different with SRMR from Mplus.

Thank you very much,

Dai

lavaan 191127 dwc2.txt
wc 191127_2.out

Yves Rosseel

unread,
Nov 28, 2019, 5:55:54 AM11/28/19
to lav...@googlegroups.com
Thanks for reporting. I will investigate this.

Yves.

On 11/27/19 9:41 PM, Dai Duong wrote:
> Hi everyone,
>
> I run my model on Mplus and lavaan. Results are 99.99% similar except
> *SRMR in Mplus is .063* while in *lavaan is .045*
>
> I don’t know why they are different while other indices are identical.
>
> In lavaan, fitMeasures() even produces *srmr_mplus (.281)* and
> *srmr_mplus_nomean (.045).* Both are very much different with SRMR from
> Mplus.
>
> Thank you very much,
>
> Dai
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "lavaan" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
> an email to lavaan+un...@googlegroups.com
> <mailto:lavaan+un...@googlegroups.com>.
> To view this discussion on the web visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lavaan/f18d0d7a-4d3b-4fa5-972d-5fa1d761b6f4%40googlegroups.com
> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/lavaan/f18d0d7a-4d3b-4fa5-972d-5fa1d761b6f4%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
Yves Rosseel -- http://www.da.ugent.be
Department of Data Analysis, Ghent University
http://lavaan.org
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages