Hi!
I have conducted a CLPM and a RI-CLPM models in R using Lavaan. The models seem to work fine (goodness of fit indices, results) although I noticed that the unstandardized and standardized estimates look pretty similar (both in the CLPM and RI). I am using mean scales in the model (scaling 1-3), and to me, the data looks fine.
I have pasted a copy of the results from the CLPM below. Basically, what I'm wondering is whether the similarity in the betas could be a sign of a problem or not?
Best regards,
Kape
Regressions:
Estimate Std.Err z-value P(>|z|) Std.lv Std.all
T2Dis ~
T1Dis (a) 0.424 0.022 19.244 0.000 0.424 0.460
T3Dis ~
T2Dis (a) 0.424 0.022 19.244 0.000 0.424 0.445
T2Sol ~
T1Sol (b) 0.405 0.023 17.814 0.000 0.405 0.425
T3Sol ~
T2Sol (b) 0.405 0.023 17.814 0.000 0.405 0.426
T2Con ~
T1Con (c) 0.456 0.022 20.485 0.000 0.456 0.435
T3Con ~
T2Con (c) 0.456 0.022 20.485 0.000 0.456 0.460
T2Sol ~
T1Dis (d) 0.157 0.023 6.827 0.000 0.157 0.160
T3Sol ~
T2Dis (d) 0.157 0.023 6.827 0.000 0.157 0.155
T2Con ~
T1Dis (e) 0.055 0.033 1.661 0.097 0.055 0.045
T3Con ~
T2Dis (e) 0.055 0.033 1.661 0.097 0.055 0.042
T2Del ~
T1Dis (f) -0.048 0.012 -4.213 0.000 -0.048 -0.124
T3Del ~
T2Dis (f) -0.048 0.012 -4.213 0.000 -0.048 -0.110
T2Del ~
T1Del (g) 0.614 0.054 11.300 0.000 0.614 0.439