I think you are confusing different uses of the ambiguous term "baseline model". It sounds like you are taking about a best-fitting model against which to compare more restricted models, as in comparing a restricted structural model among common factors (i.e., your latent regression model), compared to a CFA with unrestricted covariances among common factors (i.e., your measurement model).
The "baseline" model reported in summary() or fitMeasures() output is instead the "null" model that is used to calculate incremental fit indices such as CFI and TLI. This is a worst-fitting model, not a best-fitting model. For continuous data, the default null model in lavaan (and all other SEM software I am aware of) is the "independence" model, which constraints all covariances to zero, and only freely estimates means and variances. To see the default version of the independence model for categorical data, you can inspect the parameter table lavaan uses.
fit <- lavaan(...)
lav_partable_independence(fit)
Terrence D. Jorgensen
Postdoctoral Researcher, Methods and Statistics
Research Institute for Child Development and Education, the University of Amsterdam