Part of results from ULS and DWLS estimators are different

瀏覽次數:27 次
跳到第一則未讀訊息

Chao Xu

未讀,
2018年7月28日 下午5:32:032018/7/28
收件者:lavaan
Hi all,

I estimated my bifactor model with these two estimators. The results turn out to be very similar to each other for the most part. But there are several factor loading estimates differ quite a lot. Under these circumstances, is there a guideline as to which of these estimators should be chosen (i.e., more reliable)?

I noticed one paper on Structural Equation Modeling in 2009 suggests ULS over DWLS (see below). So any thoughts on this issue?


Thank you,
Chao

Terrence Jorgensen

未讀,
2018年7月29日 晚上8:00:192018/7/29
收件者:lavaan
any thoughts on this issue?

I find it more useful to post general questions on SEMNET, which has a much wider set of experts who might have read something more recent that could be informative for you.


Terrence D. Jorgensen
Postdoctoral Researcher, Methods and Statistics
Research Institute for Child Development and Education, the University of Amsterdam

Chao Xu

未讀,
2018年8月10日 晚上10:33:332018/8/10
收件者:lavaan
Hi Terrence,

Thanks for your reply. I appreciate your help as always.

I posted the issue here because I am using different least squares estimators in lavaan. So I figure it might be appealing to other lavaan users if I put up my questions here for discussion. But anyway, thanks for the suggestion as to posting my questions on a more specified forum.

Chao

回覆所有人
回覆作者
轉寄
0 則新訊息