Saturated model simplification issue

1,446 views
Skip to first unread message

Fülöp Attila

unread,
Sep 15, 2014, 4:33:37 AM9/15/14
to lav...@googlegroups.com
Dear All, 

My question is rather statistically-related, than lavaan-related. However, I don't know how other SEM packages in R would handle this, therefore it could be just a "feature" of lavaan... 

When performing a path analysis, in my very firs path model my Chis-sq value, df value and P value are all "0.000" or "NA" (when evaluating model fit). I suppose my model is saturated and this is the reason.. 
My problem is, that I want to simplify my initial model by deleting non significant paths from it, however I'm not sure if is correct to use the P values of the paths, if the model fit cannot be evaluated. How should I handle this issue?

Thank you in advance!

Attila

ps. See above an example for my problem..
 
summary(fit.path.hole.mlm.br1, fit.measures=TRUE)

lavaan (0.5-16) converged normally after  42 iterations

  Number of observations                            48

  Estimator                                         ML      Robust
  Minimum Function Test Statistic                0.000       0.000
  Degrees of freedom                                 0           0
  P-value (Chi-square)                           0.000       0.000
  Scaling correction factor                                     NA
    for the Satorra-Bentler correction

Model test baseline model:

  Minimum Function Test Statistic               37.975      37.497
  Degrees of freedom                                10          10
  P-value                                        0.000       0.000

User model versus baseline model:

  Comparative Fit Index (CFI)                    1.000       1.000
  Tucker-Lewis Index (TLI)                       1.000       1.000

Loglikelihood and Information Criteria:

  Loglikelihood user model (H0)               -336.784    -336.784
  Loglikelihood unrestricted model (H1)       -336.784    -336.784

  Number of free parameters                         18          18
  Akaike (AIC)                                 709.568     709.568
  Bayesian (BIC)                               743.250     743.250
  Sample-size adjusted Bayesian (BIC)          686.779     686.779

Root Mean Square Error of Approximation:

  RMSEA                                          0.000       0.000
  90 Percent Confidence Interval          0.000  0.000       0.000  0.000
  P-value RMSEA <= 0.05                          1.000       1.000

Standardized Root Mean Square Residual:

  SRMR                                           0.000       0.000

Parameter estimates:

  Information                                 Expected
  Standard Errors                           Robust.sem

                   Estimate  Std.err  Z-value  P(>|z|)
Regressions:
  holetot ~
    ug.scaled        -0.898    0.525   -1.711    0.087
    logfdb.scaled     1.351    0.387    3.493    0.000
    SMI.scaled       -0.652    0.302   -2.161    0.031
    sex              -1.235    0.671   -1.841    0.066
  ug.scaled ~
    SMI.scaled       -0.168    0.117   -1.431    0.152
    sex               0.845    0.265    3.186    0.001
  logfdb.scaled ~
    SMI.scaled       -0.078    0.144   -0.542    0.588
    ug.scaled         0.331    0.164    2.019    0.043
    sex               0.109    0.273    0.399    0.690
  SMI.scaled ~
    sex               0.067    0.296    0.227    0.820

Intercepts:
    holetot           5.030    1.086    4.633    0.000
    ug.scaled        -1.233    0.391   -3.155    0.002
    logfdb.scaled    -0.159    0.402   -0.395    0.693
    SMI.scaled       -0.098    0.416   -0.236    0.813

Variances:
    holetot           5.380    1.280
    ug.scaled         0.779    0.176
    logfdb.scaled     0.840    0.147
    SMI.scaled        0.978    0.242

Sunthud Pornprasertmanit

unread,
Sep 15, 2014, 10:45:37 AM9/15/14
to lav...@googlegroups.com
You might find this note from David Kenny useful:



--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "lavaan" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to lavaan+un...@googlegroups.com.
To post to this group, send email to lav...@googlegroups.com.
Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/lavaan.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Fülöp Attila

unread,
Sep 15, 2014, 2:23:33 PM9/15/14
to lav...@googlegroups.com
Thank you very much for the link! 
The problem is that I have a path analysis with observed variables only.. Does these tips refer to my case as well?

Terrence Jorgensen

unread,
Sep 15, 2014, 6:57:25 PM9/15/14
to lav...@googlegroups.com

The problem is that I have a path analysis with observed variables only.. Does these tips refer to my case as well?

Yes, the principles in the link apply to your model.  You don't have latent variables, so ignore the notes about factor loadings, but you do have several regression parameters, so pay attention to the notes about the "structural" model parameters.

Terry

Fülöp Attila

unread,
Sep 16, 2014, 12:35:08 PM9/16/14
to lav...@googlegroups.com
Okay! Thank you very much for your help! 

Best wishes,
Attila
Reply all
Reply to author
Forward
0 new messages