Hi,
I am conducting a power analysis for an experiment in which one of the two key variables (X) is measured as continuous, while the other, which i experimentally manipulate (Y) is dichotomous. I am interested in setting standardized effect sizes (small, medium, or large betas) so that I can communicate power results clearly.
Initially, I considered standardizing the continuous variable after data generation step. However, since the model also includes an interaction between X and Y, as well as a quadratic term X², standardizing the derived terms separately would break the mathematical relationship between X and X² from what i read online and it is not right.
My question is: is this implementation sufficient for all betas to be interpretable as standardized effect sizes in the conventional sense (i.e., comparable to small/medium/large benchmarks)?
Or do I also need to standardize X and Y explicitly before constructing exoCov and entering them into the model?
And still will the betas for X² or XY be interpret able as standardized betas?
Thank you very much for your time checking my question.
Ioannis