You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to lavaan
A scale I examined has a 6-point likert scale and detailed anchor points. In addition, the items are distributed skew. I did a CFA with MLR as well as with WLSMV. With WLSMV as estimator, the scale performs much better in terms of fit indices (RMSEA, CFI) than with MLR. What could be possible reasons for this? Is this solely due to the method of calculation? Or does that also say anything about my data?
Mauricio Garnier-Villarreal
unread,
Feb 19, 2019, 1:53:25 AM2/19/19
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message
to lavaan
Tina
The main reason for this is because MLR still assumes that the items are measured as continuous. So, the assumption of continuous metric is a misspecification of the model
Tina
unread,
Feb 21, 2019, 4:28:40 AM2/21/19
Reply to author
Sign in to reply to author
Forward
Sign in to forward
Delete
You do not have permission to delete messages in this group
Copy link
Report message
Show original message
Either email addresses are anonymous for this group or you need the view member email addresses permission to view the original message