Hey guys,
I have the following model consisting of four latent factors f1-f4 (each with 5 manifest continuous indicators item1-item20) and one manifest endogenous ordinal variable var1 (expression 0 to 4); model see attachment. My goal is to investigate how the latent factors f1-f4 explain the variable var1.
I have specified the model as follows:
mod1 <-'
f1 =~ item1 + item2 + item3 + item4 + item5
f2 =~ item6 + item7 + item8 + item9 + item10
f3 =~ item11 + item12 + item13 + item14 + item15
f4 =~ item16 + item17 + item18 + item19 + item20
var1 ~ f1 + f2 + f3 + f4
'
fit.mod1 <- sem(model = mod1, data = data, estimator = "MLR", missing = "FIML",
std.lv = TRUE)
It is important for me to use MLR/FIML as estimator. I am aware that lava an can only calculate something like this with the WLSMV estimator if I specify var1 as ordered. However, for feasibility reasons, I assume a continuous distribution of var1 and reason with Rhemtulla et al. (2012) that the MLR estimator for this is robust to violation when I want to interpret the regressions.
I am now asking myself the following questions:
1) Is this a MIMIC model, or can I only speak of MIMIC when I have more manifest endogenous variables that I am testing for correlation?
2) Have I specified the model correctly like this?
3) Does anyone know literature/have a tip for me on how I can consider var1 as an ordinal scaled variable after all and check that with lava an using MLR/FIML?
Thank a lot for help,
Gregor
Rhemtulla, M., Brosseau-Liard, P. É., & Savalei, V. (2012). When can categorical variables be treated as continuous? A comparison of robust continuous and categorical SEM estimation methods under suboptimal conditions. Psychological Methods, 17(3), 354-373. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0029315