Hi Michelle,
There are two options I can think of from the top of my head.
Option 1:
I think you can write a multi-group model with gender in it and the compare the unstandardized coefficients directly
- 1. label the paths differently
o f1, f2, f3 / m1, m2, m3 (for both females and males respectively
- 2. write code to compare the paths (example: #compare group effects
o diff_a := f1 – m1
o diff_b := f2 - m2
o diff_c := f3 – m3
- 3. include gender in your estimation statement
o fit <- growth(model, data = growth, se = "bootstrap", bootstrap = 1000, group = "Gender")
Option 2:
You can compare the unstandardized coefficients you have. Read the following paper “Raymond Paternoster, Robert Brame, Paul Mazerolle & Alex Piquero (1998) Using the correct statistical test for the equality of regression coefficients. Criminology, 36(4), 859-866.”
Below is a link to the paper: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.458.9930&rep=rep1&type=pdf
Would a simple t-test be appropriate?
the sample consists of couples and therefore I should use some test with dependent groups. Do you have any input here to?
The thing is, I want to make latent growth curve modeling, not a APIM model. I also checked the APIM, but prefered doing LGM (having 4 timepoints).
We`re working on a multilevel model at the moment, but for my thesis I have to write down what I have at the moment and these are only separate models.. therefore I`d need any test to compare these two models (their slopes respectively).