Hi all,
Apologies if this has been answered before, I had a quick search and couldn't find anything definitive and am new to CFA and SEM in general.
I am trying to understand the difference between standardized (e.g. the output labelled std.all) and standardized ('Estimate') factor loadings. For instance, in the following output, the B and C variables have very low Estimates, but high 'standardized' coefficients. My understanding is that this is because those two variables are proportions (so range from 0-1 numerically) and the coefficient would refer to, say, a 1% increase, whereas most other variables are either binary (D-F) or ordered categorical (A) with a small number of categories. The standardized coefficients account for this and thus can be directly compared.
Is my understanding here correct? If so, when reporting should I report the standardized coefficients? This CFA will eventually be part of a larger SEM model so the reporting would predominantly be to highlight that the factors either (a) loaded well, or (b) were theoretically necessary.
Thanks in advance
Latent Variables:
Estimate Std.Err z-value P(>|z|) Std.lv Std.all
Unhealthiness =~
A 0.959 0.013 72.235 0.000 0.959 0.959
B 0.096 0.001 73.310 0.000 0.096 0.843
C 0.082 0.001 71.026 0.000 0.082 0.503
D 1.212 0.018 67.978 0.000 1.212 0.790
E 0.833 0.013 66.599 0.000 0.833 0.833
F 0.464 0.016 28.958 0.000 0.464 0.464