Options for redistricting maps and table--now in pdf format

[Amy Lovvorn]

For those having trouble viewing the Word docs.

 

 

[mary britting]

Thanks, Amy. I took a look at the attachments, but wasn't sure how to interpret them.  All the maps made me think the LR students were going to McClendon, but the table seemed to say LR would not be affected.  I'm sure there will be some buzz in the google group, so I'll stay tuned.  Hope you are all well.  Cheers, Britt  

---

From: amy...@gmail.com
To: laurel-ridge-...@googlegroups.com
Subject: Options for redistricting maps and table--now in pdf format
Date: Mon, 12 Sep 2011 20:58:46 -0400

[Becky Oh]

Can someone please explain what is going on?  I saw this e-mail come in and figured it was some old thing that got stuck in cyberspace (especially since Medlock was still on the map).  Is there some sort o new development?

[Victoria Seahorn]

That’s what I am thinking.  I was wondering if it is a virus or hacker?

[Amy Lovvorn]

since this shows it originating from me ... there is nothing new that I know of and I did not recently send anything out (besides this email!), so disregard and I will look into viruses from my end.

Amy

[Becky Oh]

phew.  

[nicole]

I have looked over these maps and the chart.  These are proposals and analysis of the schools based on what we were recommending with not sending our 70 students to McClendon. 

 

I don't know where these came from, looks more like internal information that they used to review our proposal!! 

Nicki

---

From: Amy Lovvorn <amy...@gmail.com>
To: laurel-ridge-...@googlegroups.com
Sent: Mon, September 12, 2011 8:58:46 PM

Subject: Options for redistricting maps and table--now in pdf format